Literature DB >> 15362716

Solid or gaseous circulating brain emboli: are they separable by transcranial ultrasound?

Georges A Darbellay1, Rebecca Duff, Jean-Marc Vesin, Paul-André Despland, Dirk W Droste, Carlos Molina, Joachim Serena, Roman Sztajzel, Patrick Ruchat, Theodoros Karapanayiotides, Afksendyios Kalangos, Julien Bogousslavsky, Erich B Ringelstein, Gérald Devuyst.   

Abstract

High-intensity transient signals (HITS) detected by transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound may correspond to artifacts or to microembolic signals, the latter being either solid or gaseous emboli. The goal of this study was to assess what can be achieved with an automatic signal processing system for artifact/microembolic signals and solid/gas differentiation in different clinical situations. The authors studied 3,428 HITS in vivo in a multicenter study, i.e., 1,608 artifacts in healthy subjects, 649 solid emboli in stroke patients with a carotid stenosis, and 1,171 gaseous emboli in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale. They worked with the dual-gate TCD combined to three types of statistical classifiers: binary decision trees (BDT), artificial neural networks (ANN), and support vector machines (SVM). The sensitivity and specificity to separate artifacts from microembolic signals by BDT reached was 94% and 97%, respectively. For the discrimination between solid and gaseous emboli, the classifier achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 81% for BDT, 84% and 84% for ANN, and 86% and 86% for SVM, respectively. The current results for artifact elimination and solid/gas differentiation are already useful to extract data for future prospective clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15362716     DOI: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000126235.54306.FA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


  5 in total

1.  Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: the arterial filter.

Authors:  Filip De Somer
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

2.  The amount of solid cerebral microemboli during carotid stenting does not relate to the frequency of silent ischemic lesions.

Authors:  M Rosenkranz; J Fiehler; W Niesen; C Waiblinger; B Eckert; O Wittkugel; T Kucinski; J Röther; H Zeumer; C Weiller; U Sliwka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Operative strategies to reduce cerebral embolic events during on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A stratified, prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael E Halkos; Aaron Anderson; Jose Nilo G Binongo; Anthony Stringer; Yi Lasanajak; Vinod H Thourani; Omar M Lattouf; Robert A Guyton; Kim T Baio; Eric Sarin; William B Keeling; N Renee Cook; Katherine Carssow; Alexis Neill; Kathryn E Glas; John D Puskas
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Comparison between conventional duplex ultrasonography and the dual-gate Doppler mode for hemodynamic measurements of the carotid arteries.

Authors:  Jeanne Hersant; Pierre Ramondou; Delphine Douillet; Stanislas Abrard; Patrick Vandeputte; François-Xavier Lapébie; Pierre Abraham; Samir Henni
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2021-11-10

5.  An in vitro comparison of embolus differentiation techniques for clinically significant macroemboli: dual-frequency technique versus frequency modulation method.

Authors:  Caroline Banahan; Zach Rogerson; Clément Rousseau; Kumar V Ramnarine; David H Evans; Emma M L Chung
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.998

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.