Literature DB >> 15362272

Evaluation of impedance based indices of cardiac contractility in dogs.

Zhi-yong Peng1, Lester A H Critchley, Benny S P Fok, Anthony E James.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac function can be monitored simply and safely by the impedance method. A number of parameters that reflect cardiac contractility can be derived from the impedance waveform. These include the systolic time ratio (STR), the index of contracticity (IC), the acceleration index (ACI) and the Heather index. This study evaluates their reliability.
METHODS: In sixteen anaesthetized dogs an ultrasonic flow probe was placed on the ascending aorta using a left thoracotomy approach and catheter placed in the femoral artery to measure blood pressure. This allowed the reference measurement of cardiac contractility from blood flow (dF/dt(max)) and pressure (dP/dt(max)). Comparative 1-minute impedance based measurements were made by a RheoCardioMonitor (ACMA, Singapore), whilst contractility was increased 2 to 6 fold, over 113 (52 to 212) minutes, using dopamine and adrenaline infusions. The association between the reference and impedance measurements was determined by correlation. The correlation coefficients (r) were compared using paired t-tests. Results are presented as mean +/- SD.
RESULTS: The ACI (r = 0.76 +/- 0.13) and Heather index (r = 0.74 +/- 0.14) were more closely associated with the reference measurement (dF/dt(max)) than IC (r = 0.65 +/- 0.23) (p < 0.05) and STR (r = 0.33 +/- 24) (p < 0.01). Results for ACI and the Heather index were similar. STR was unrelated to the reference method in 10 out of 16 experiments. Correlation was better when using flow probe data (dF/ dt(max)) than arterial pressure data (dP/dt(max)) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: ACI and the Heather index were the most reliable impedance derived indices of cardiac contractility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15362272     DOI: 10.1023/b:jocm.0000032720.02801.e6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of bioimpedance and echocardiography in measuring systolic heart function in cardiac patients.

Authors:  H J Kerkkamp; R M Heethaar
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Electrical bioimpedance for noninvasive measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  M H Weil
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale.

Authors:  D P Bernstein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Continuous noninvasive cardiac output: are we getting there?

Authors:  K K Tremper
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  The Minnesota impedance cardiograph- theory and applications.

Authors:  W G Kubicek; J Kottke; M U Ramos; R P Patterson; D A Witsoe; J W Labree; W Remole; T E Layman; H Schoening; J T Garamela
Journal:  Biomed Eng       Date:  1974-09

6.  The relationship of alterations in systolic time intervals to ejection fraction in patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  C L Garrard; A M Weissler; H T Dodge
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Evaluation of left ventricular function by impedance cardiography: a review.

Authors:  H D Fuller
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.194

8.  Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output--not ready for prime time.

Authors:  D E Clarke; T A Raffin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Haemodynamic effects of subarachnoid block in elderly patients.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J C Stuart; T G Short; T Gin
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 10.  Impedance cardiography. The impact of new technology.

Authors:  L A Critchley
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Year in review in journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2014: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Steffen Rex; Thomas Scheeren; Lester Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.