Literature DB >> 15361726

Measuring antibody responses to a live attenuated influenza vaccine in children.

Min-Shi Lee1, Kutubuddin Mahmood, Lopa Adhikary, Marilyn J August, Julie Cordova, Iksung Cho, George Kemble, Keith Reisinger, Robert E Walker, Paul M Mendelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay is the standard method for evaluating inactivated influenza vaccines, but no standard assay has been established for evaluating live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV). LAIV containing A/Beijing/262/95(H1N1) induced low serum HAI antibody responses to the antigenic variant, A/New Caledonia/20/99(H1N1) in a serologic study but provided protection against the A/New Caledonia-like viruses in a community study. Neutralization and HAI assays were compared by measuring H1N1 cross-reactive antibody responses to the LAIV in children.
METHODS: Sera were collected from 50 children 1-8 years of age before vaccination and 4-6 weeks after each dose of the LAIV. Antibody titers to the 3 vaccine viruses were measured by the HAI assay, whereas antibody titers against the H1N1 vaccine virus (A/Beijing/262/95) and 2 H1N1 antigenic variants (A/Shenzhen/227/95 and A/New Caledonia/20/99) were measured by the HAI and neutralization assays.
RESULTS: Initially seronegative participants were more likely to develop HAI seroconversion responses to the 3 vaccine viruses than the baseline seropositive participants (77% versus 14% for H1N1, 100% versus 20% for H3N2, 100% versus 19% for B, P < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). For the H1N1 cross-reactive antibody responses, seroconversion rates measured by the neutralization assay were significantly higher than those measured by the HAI assay (95% versus 78%, P = 0.0485 for A/Beijing/262/95; 75% versus 24%, P < 0.0001 for A/Shenzhen/227/95; 51% versus 5%, P < 0.0001 for A/New Caledonia/20/99).
CONCLUSIONS: The neutralization assay was more sensitive than the HAI assay for measuring H1N1 antibody responses after vaccination of children with the LAIV and may provide a better correlate of clinical protection provided by the LAIV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15361726     DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000137566.87691.3b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  18 in total

1.  Nebulized live-attenuated influenza vaccine provides protection in ferrets at a reduced dose.

Authors:  Jennifer Humberd Smith; Mark Papania; Darin Knaus; Paula Brooks; Debra L Haas; Raydel Mair; James Barry; S Mark Tompkins; Ralph A Tripp
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Utilization of serologic assays to support efficacy of vaccines in nonclinical and clinical trials: meeting at the crossroads.

Authors:  Dace V Madore; Bruce D Meade; Fran Rubin; Carolyn Deal; Freyja Lynn
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Cell culture-based influenza vaccines: A necessary and indispensable investment for the future.

Authors:  Nagendra R Hegde
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Differences in antibody responses between trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and live attenuated influenza vaccine correlate with the kinetics and magnitude of interferon signaling in children.

Authors:  Raquel G Cao; Nicolas M Suarez; Gerlinde Obermoser; Santiago M C Lopez; Emilio Flano; Sara E Mertz; Randy A Albrecht; Adolfo García-Sastre; Asuncion Mejias; Hui Xu; Huanying Qin; Derek Blankenship; Karolina Palucka; Virginia Pascual; Octavio Ramilo
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Comparison of the influenza virus-specific effector and memory B-cell responses to immunization of children and adults with live attenuated or inactivated influenza virus vaccines.

Authors:  Sanae Sasaki; Maria C Jaimes; Tyson H Holmes; Cornelia L Dekker; Kutubuddin Mahmood; George W Kemble; Ann M Arvin; Harry B Greenberg
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Recommendations on the use of live, attenuated influenza vaccine (FluMist®): Supplemental Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2011-2012 An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2011-11-30

7.  Live, attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vehicles are strong inducers of immunity toward influenza B virus.

Authors:  Victor C Huber; Loren H Kleimeyer; Jonathan A McCullers
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Correlation of cellular immune responses with protection against culture-confirmed influenza virus in young children.

Authors:  Bruce D Forrest; Michael W Pride; Andrew J Dunning; Maria Rosario Z Capeding; Tawee Chotpitayasunondh; John S Tam; Ruth Rappaport; John H Eldridge; William C Gruber
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-04-30

9.  Correlation between Virus Replication and Antibody Responses in Macaques following Infection with Pandemic Influenza A Virus.

Authors:  Gerrit Koopman; Petra Mooij; Liesbeth Dekking; Daniëlla Mortier; Ivonne G Nieuwenhuis; Melanie van Heteren; Harmjan Kuipers; Edmond J Remarque; Katarina Radošević; Willy M J M Bogers
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Predicting antigenic variants of influenza A/H3N2 viruses.

Authors:  Min-Shi Lee; Jack Si-En Chen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.