Literature DB >> 15361196

Conventional 4-field box radiotherapy technique for cancer cervix: potential for geographic miss without CECT scan-based planning.

Y S Nagar1, S Singh, S Kumar, P Lal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The advantage of 4-field radiation to the pelvis is that the use of lateral portals spares a portion of the small bowel anteriorly and rectum posteriorly. The standard lateral portals defined in textbooks are not always adequate especially in advanced cancer cervix.
METHODS: An analysis was done to determine adequacy of margins of standard lateral pelvic portals with CECT defined tumor volumes. The study included 40 patients of FIGO stage IIB and IIIB treated definitively for cancer cervix between 1998 and 2000. An inadequate margin was defined if the cervical growth and uterus were not encompassed by the 95% isodose.
RESULTS: An inadequate posterior margin was common with bulky disease (P = 0.06) and with retroverted uterus (P = 0.08). Menopausal status, FIGO stage, associated myoma, and age were of no apparent prognostic significance. Bulk retained significant on multivariate analysis. An inadequate anterior margin was common in premenopausal (P = 0.01); anteverted uterus (P = 0.02); associated myoma (P = 0.01); and younger patients (P = 0.03). It was not influenced by bulk or stage. Menopausal status and associated myoma retained significant on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Without the knowledge of precise tumor volume, the 4-field technique with standard portals is potentially risky as it may under dose the tumor through lateral portals and the standard AP/ PA portals are a safer option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15361196     DOI: 10.1111/j.1048-891x.2004.14522.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  4 in total

1.  Significant impact on the oncologic outcomes with intensity modulated radiotherapy and conformational radiotherapy over conventional radiotherapy in cervix cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gustavo Arruda Viani; Fred Muller Dos Santos; Juliana Fernandes Pavoni
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-06-07

2.  Uncertainty concerning the 4-field box technique for Stage-IB2 carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Priyanka Thakur; Swaroop Revannasiddaiah; Madhup Rastogi; Manoj Kumar Gupta; Rajeev Kumar Seam; Manish Gupta
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-01

3.  Can We Apply National Cancer Grid of India Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Cervical Cancer in Low-Resource Settings?

Authors:  Linus Chuang
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-07

4.  National Cancer Grid of India Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Supriya J Chopra; Ashwathy Mathew; Amita Maheshwari; Neerja Bhatla; Shalini Singh; Bhawana Rai; Shylasree T Surappa; Jaya Ghosh; Dayanand Sharma; Jaydip Bhaumik; Manash Biswas; Kedar Deodhar; Palak Popat; Sushil Giri; Umesh Mahantshetty; Hemant Tongaonkar; Ramesh Billimaga; Reena Engineer; Surbhi Grover; Abraham Pedicayil; Jyoti Bajpai; Bharat Rekhi; Aruna Alihari; Govind Babu; Rajkumar Thangrajan; Santosh Menon; Sneha Shah; Sidhanna Palled; Yogesh Kulkarni; Seema Gulia; Lavanya Naidu; Meenakshi Thakur; Venkatesh Rangrajan; Rajendra Kerkar; Sudeep Gupta; Shyam K Shrivastava
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.