Literature DB >> 15360989

Finding the answers in primary care: information seeking by rural and nonrural clinicians.

Paul N Gorman1, Patricia Yao, Veena Seshadri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information systems for rural practice may assume that rural clinicians have different information seeking, but studies have not directly compared rural and nonrural information needs using common methodology.
OBJECTIVE: Compare rural and non-rural: 1) information needs; 2) information seeking; 3) effectiveness of information seeking; and 4) use of information resources.
DESIGN: Observation and interviews during one half-day of office practice; telephone follow-up 2-10 days later. PARTICIPANTS &
SETTING: Primary care physicians (39), nurse practitioners (42), and physician assistants (22) in ambulatory practices in rural and nonrural Oregon. MEASURES: 1) number of questions asked, 2) number of questions pursued, 3) number of questions answered), and 4) use of knowledge resources.
RESULTS: Rural clinicians practiced in smaller groups, but were otherwise similar to nonrural clinicians. During half-day interviews, clinicians cared for an average of 8.2 patients (95% CI 7.5 - 8.8) and asked an average of 0.83 questions per patient seen (95% CI 0.73 - 0.92). At follow up, they had pursued an average of 47% of their questions (95% CI 40 - 53%), and reported being successful in finding an answer to 77% of those they pursued (95% CI 70 - 84%). There were no statistically significant differences between rural and nonrural clinicians for any of these variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Rural and nonrural clinicians had similar information needs, information seeking, knowledge resource use, and effectiveness at finding answers to their questions. Human consultants, digital resources, and library-based resources were less available, but these differences in availability had little impact on their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15360989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  12 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of MEDLINE filters on evidence retrieval: study protocol.

Authors:  Salimah Z Shariff; Meaghan S Cuerden; R Brian Haynes; K Ann McKibbon; Nancy L Wilczynski; Arthur V Iansavichus; Mark R Speechley; Amardeep Thind; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  What you don't know can hurt your patients.

Authors:  Linda Casebeer
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-03-12

3.  Information needs and information seeking in a biomedical research setting: a study of scientists and science administrators.

Authors:  Suzanne F Grefsheim; Jocelyn A Rankin
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-10

4.  Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: implications for library services.

Authors:  Laura L Haines; Jeanene Light; Donna O'Malley; Frances A Delwiche
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2010-01

5.  Impact of Safety-Related Regulations on Codeine Use in Children: A Quasi-Experimental Study Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.

Authors:  Chih-Wan Lin; Ching-Huan Wang; Wei-I Huang; Wei-Ming Ke; Pi-Hui Chao; Wen-Wen Chen; Fei-Yuan Hsiao
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  PrimeAnswers: A practical interface for answering primary care questions.

Authors:  Debra S Ketchell; Leilani St Anna; David Kauff; Barak Gaster; Diane Timberlake
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Information-seeking behavior and use of information resources by clinical research coordinators.

Authors:  Charles B Wessel; Nancy H Tannery; Barbara A Epstein
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-01

8.  Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display.

Authors:  M A Clarke; L M Steege; J L Moore; R J Koopman; J L Belden; M S Kim
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Systematically assessing the situational relevance of electronic knowledge resources: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Pierre Pluye; Roland M Grad; Naveen Mysore; Loes Knaapen; Janique Johnson-Lafleur; Martin Dawes
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  A structured classification of the types of pain research studies accessed by different health professionals involved in pain management.

Authors:  Vanitha Arumugam; Joy C MacDermid; Ruby Grewal; Zakir Uddin
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2019-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.