Literature DB >> 15360857

A comparison of semantic categories of the ISO reference terminology models for nursing and the MedLEE natural language processing system.

Suzanne Bakken1, Sookyung Hyun, Carol Friedman, Stephen Johnson.   

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) systems have demonstrated utility in parsing narrative texts for purposes such as surveillance and decision support. However, there has been little work related to NLP of nursing narratives. The purpose of this study was to compare the semantic categories of a NLP system (Medical Language Extraction and Encoding [MedLEE] system) with the semantic domains, categories, and attributes of the International Standards Organization(ISO) reference terminology models for nursing diagnoses and nursing actions. All but two MedLEE diagnosis and procedure-related semantic categories mapped to ISO models. In some instances, we found exact correspondence between the semantic structures of MedLEE and the ISO models. In other situations (e.g. aspects of site or location), the ISO model was not as granular as MedLEE. For clinical procedure and non-invasive examination, two ISO nursing action model components (action and target) were required to represent the MedLEE semantic category. The ISO model requires additional specification of selected semantic categories for the abstract semantic domains in order to achieve the objective of using NLP to parse and encode data from nursing narratives. Our analysis also suggests areas for extension of MedLEE.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15360857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  7 in total

1.  Document clustering of clinical narratives: a systematic study of clinical sublanguages.

Authors:  Olga Patterson; John F Hurdle
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  What nurses do: use of the ISO Reference Terminology Model for Nursing Action as a framework for analyzing MICU nursing practice patterns.

Authors:  Margot Andison; Jacqueline Moss
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

3.  Informing standard development and understanding user needs with omaha system signs and symptoms text entries in community-based care settings.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Bonnie L Westra; Nandhini Raman; Karen A Monsen; Madeleine J Kerr; Colleen H Hart; Debra A Solomon; Jill E Timm
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

4.  Analysis of free text with omaha system targets in community-based care to inform practice and terminology development.

Authors:  O Farri; K A Monsen; B L Westra; G B Melton
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 5.  Machine learning and radiology.

Authors:  Shijun Wang; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Exploring the ability of natural language processing to extract data from nursing narratives.

Authors:  Sookyung Hyun; Stephen B Johnson; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Pooling annotated corpora for clinical concept extraction.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Manabu Torii; Siddhartha R Jonnalagadda; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2013-01-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.