Literature DB >> 15360033

Rewriting public health information in plain language.

Rima E Rudd1, Kimberly Kaphingst, Tayla Colton, John Gregoire, James Hyde.   

Abstract

Public health materials are often designed to inform and rally the public to spur action and maintain vigilance on important issues to family, work, community, and public policy. Limited access to public health information certainly curtails knowledge and awareness but may also hamper action and civic involvement. A growth in published assessments of health materials indicates an increased interest in the mismatch between the reading level of most health materials and the reading ability of the average adult. However, while several guidebooks offer suggestions for developing new materials, little attention has been given to the process of rewriting materials and grappling with bureaucratic language. We describe, in this case study, a process we used to assess and then rewrite a federally mandated report to consumers about the quality of their water.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15360033     DOI: 10.1080/10810730490447039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  9 in total

1.  Mismatch between health-care professionals' and patients' views on a diabetes patient decision aid: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ping Yein Lee; Ee Ming Khoo; Wah Yun Low; Yew Kong Lee; Khatijah Lim Abdullah; Syahidatul Akmal Azmi; Chirk Jenn Ng
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Screening for postpartum depression among low-income mothers using an interactive voice response system.

Authors:  Helen G Kim; Joni Geppert; Tu Quan; Yiscah Bracha; Virginia Lupo; Diana B Cutts
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

3.  Public Engagement with Biotechnology Inside and Outside the Classroom: Community-Focused Approaches.

Authors:  Jorge Jimenez; Joyonna Gamble-George; Giovanna Danies; Ronda L Hamm; Ana Maria Porras
Journal:  GEN Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-18

4.  Patient Experiences with Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Gayle Restall; Valerie Michaud; John R Walker; Celeste Waldman; Charles N Bernstein; Jason Park; Kristy Wittmeier; Harminder Singh
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06-17

5.  eHealth research from the user's perspective.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Ben Shneiderman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  The Persistence of the Pamphlet: On the Continued Relevance of the Health Information Pamphlet in the Digital Age.

Authors:  Aman Sium; Meredith Giuliani; Janet Papadakos
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Designing persuasive health materials using processing fluency: a literature review.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Okuhara; Hirono Ishikawa; Masahumi Okada; Mio Kato; Takahiro Kiuchi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-06-08

8.  A Comprehensive Analysis of How Environmental Risks of Breast Cancer are Portrayed on the Internet.

Authors:  Shibani Kulkarni; Kaleea Lewis; Swann Arp Adams; Heather M Brandt; Jamie R Lead; John R Ureda; Delores Fedrick; Chris Mathews; Daniela B Friedman
Journal:  Am J Health Educ       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 9.  Providing information about options in patient decision aids.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marla L Clayman; B Joyce Davison; Masahito Jimbo; Michel Labrecque; Richard W Martin; Heather Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.