Literature DB >> 15359921

Methionine positron emission tomography for differentiation of recurrent brain tumor and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery--in malignant glioma.

Naohiro Tsuyuguchi1, Toshihiro Takami, Ichiro Sunada, Yoshiyasu Iwai, Kazuhiro Yamanaka, Kiyoaki Tanaka, Misao Nishikawa, Kenji Ohata, Kenji Torii, Michiharu Morino, Akimasa Nishio, Mitsuhiro Hara.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we examined how to differentiate radiation necrosis from recurrent malignant glioma using positron emission tomography (PET) with 11C-methionine (Met).
METHODS: Met-PET scans were obtained from 11 adult cases of recurrent malignant glioma or radiation injury, suspected on the basis of magnetic resonance images (MRI). Patients had previously been treated with SRS after primary treatment. PET images were obtained as a static scan of 10 minutes performed 20 minutes after injection of Met. We defined two visual grades (e.g., positive or negative Met accumulation). On Met-PET scans, the portion of the tumor with the highest accumulation was selected as the region of interest (ROI), tumor-versus-normal ratio (TN) was defined as the ratio of average radioisotope counts per pixel in the tumor (T), divided by average counts per pixel in normal gray matter (N). The standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated over the same tumor ROI. Met-PET scan accuracy was evaluated by correlating findings with subsequent histological analysis (8 cases) or, in cases without surgery or biopsy, by the subsequent clinical course and MR findings (3 cases).
RESULTS: Histological examinations in 8 cases showed viable glioma cells with necrosis in 6 cases, and necrosis without viable tumor cells in 2 cases. Three other cases were considered to have radiation necrosis because they exhibited stable neurological symptoms with no sign of massive enlargement of the lesion on follow-up MR after 5 months. Mean TN was 1.31 in the radiation necrosis group (5 cases) and 1.87 in the tumor recurrence group (6 cases). Mean SUV was 1.81 in the necrosis group and 2.44 in the recurrence group. There were no statistically significant differences between the recurrence and necrosis groups in TN or SUV. Furthermore, we made a 2 x 2 factorial cross table (accumulation or no accumulation, recurrence or necrosis). From this result, the Met-PET sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting tumor recurrence were determined to be 100%, 60%, and 82% respectively. In a false positive-case, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunostaining showed a positive finding.
CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between recurrent malignant glioma and radiation necrosis following SRS in Met-PET. However, this study shows Met-PET has a sensitivity and accuracy for differentiating between recurrent glioma and necrosis, and presents important information for developing treatment strategies against post radiation reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15359921     DOI: 10.1007/bf02984466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  53 in total

1.  Development of a novel animal model to differentiate radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Sanath Kumar; Ali S Arbab; Rajan Jain; Jinkoo Kim; Ana C deCarvalho; Adarsh Shankar; Tom Mikkelsen; Stephen L Brown
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Spinal intramedullary metastasis of medulloblastoma at initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Tomoo Inoue; Toshihiro Kumabe; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Takeshi Nakajima; Mika Watanabe; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  New advances that enable identification of glioblastoma recurrence.

Authors:  Isaac Yang; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  The use of dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET in the diagnosis of patients with progressive and recurrent glioma.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Gabriele Stoffels; Christian Filss; Marion Rapp; Tobias Blau; Caroline Tscherpel; Garry Ceccon; Veronika Dunkl; Martin Weinzierl; Michael Stoffel; Michael Sabel; Gereon R Fink; Nadim J Shah; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Diagnostic dilemma of pseudoprogression in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastomas: the role of assessing relative cerebral blood flow volume and oxygen-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status.

Authors:  D-S Kong; S T Kim; E-H Kim; D H Lim; W S Kim; Y-L Suh; J-I Lee; K Park; J H Kim; D-H Nam
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  The wayward methyl group and the cascade to cancer.

Authors:  Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 8.  Treating recurrent glioblastoma: an update.

Authors:  Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015

9.  Evaluation of fluoride-labeled boronophenylalanine-PET imaging for the study of radiation effects in patients with glioblastomas.

Authors:  Minoru Miyashita; Shin-Ichi Miyatake; Yoshio Imahori; Kunio Yokoyama; Shinji Kawabata; Yoshinaga Kajimoto; Masa-Aki Shibata; Yoshinori Otsuki; Mitsunori Kirihata; Koji Ono; Toshihiko Kuroiwa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography in the clinical management of cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  Tarun Singhal; Tanjore K Narayanan; Viney Jain; Jogeshwar Mukherjee; Joseph Mantil
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.