Literature DB >> 15359396

Gastrostomy revision: incidence and indications.

Sarah J Conlon1, Tracey A Janik, Joseph S Janik, Richard J Hendrickson, Angi E Landholm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Although quite reliable, gastrostomy may require revision. However, there are no reports in the literature specifically delineating identifiable risk factors or circumstances that lead to gastrostomy revision in children with gastrostomy. The purpose of this report was to determine the rate of revision and correlate any factors that may lead to revision.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 1,042 children who underwent gastrostomy at The Children's Hospital, Denver, Colorado, between 1992 and 2002. Charts of children who underwent gastrostomy were reviewed for pertinent clinical factors and compared with those who required gastrostomy revision.
RESULTS: Of the 1,042 children, who had gastrostomies, 67 revisions were required in 61 children (6%). Of the many possible factors that could have had an influence on the revision rate, only fundoplication, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), migration of the gastrostomy site, and time correlated with the need for gastrostomy revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents should be made aware that there is a 6% chance that their child's gastrostomy may need revision and that the need for revision may increase with PEG, initial construction before 18 months of age, and the advancing age of the gastrostomy. Surgeons should avoid placing the gastrostomy near the costal margin, making a large gastrostomy exit tract through the abdominal wall and inserting a gastrostomy into the nutritionally depleted pulmonary stressed neurologically challenged child without first attempting to improve the child's nutritional status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15359396     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  5 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement: A simple procedure?

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-16

Review 2.  Fundoplication with gastrostomy vs gastrostomy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Brendan K Y Yap; Shireen Anne Nah; Yong Chen; Yee Low
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: insertion of a skin-level device using a tear-away sheath.

Authors:  Michael H Livingston; Daniel Pepe; Sarah Jones; Andreana Bütter; Neil H Merritt
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  A very feasible alternative in patients with feeding difficulties from gastrostomy: Jejunal tube advanced through the gastrostomy.

Authors:  Ramazan Karabulut; Zafer Turkyilmaz; Kaan Sonmez; Suna Ozhan Oktar; Cem Kaya; Atilla Kokurcan; Fatih Oncu; Abdullah Can Basaklar
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

5.  Laparoscopic versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nutnicha Suksamanapun; Femke A Mauritz; Josephine Franken; David C van der Zee; Maud Ya van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.