Literature DB >> 15358983

Increasing dopaminergic activity: effects of L-dopa and bromocriptine on human sensory gating.

B Oranje1, C C Gispen-de Wied, H G M Westenberg, C Kemner, M N Verbaten, R S Kahn.   

Abstract

Schizophrenic patients show a loss of sensory gating, which is reflected in a reduced P50 suppression. Because most of the symptoms in schizophrenia can be reduced by antagonists of the dopaminergic (D2) system, the loss in sensory gating might be related to an increased dopaminergic activity. Therefore, in the present study, the effects of increased dopaminergic neurotransmisson on sensory gating in healthy volunteers were investigated. In a double-blind, balanced, placebo-controlled design, healthy male volunteers were challenged in two separate studies with either 300 mg L-dopa (precursor of dopamine) or placebo (n=16) and 1.25 mg bromocriptine (D2 agonist) or placebo (n=17). Subsequently, they were tested for their sensory gating (P50 suppression). P50 suppression values in the placebo condition were comparable to those found in literature. Although both L-dopa and bromocriptine reduced P50 amplitude, they did so in an equal ratio for both the response to the conditioning (C) and the testing (T) stimuli, therefore not resulting in a reduction of the P50 suppression ratio (T/C). In the present study, neither L-dopa nor bromocriptine reduced sensory gating in healthy volunteers. This suggests that an increased dopaminergic activity in humans is not responsible for the reduction in sensory gating as seen, for example, in schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15358983     DOI: 10.1177/026988110401800310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0269-8811            Impact factor:   4.153


  7 in total

Review 1.  How human electrophysiology informs psychopharmacology: from bottom-up driven processing to top-down control.

Authors:  J Leon Kenemans; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Dopamine receptor stimulation does not modulate the loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential in humans.

Authors:  Barry V O'Neill; Rodney J Croft; Sumie Leung; Valérie Guille; Matthew Galloway; K Luan Phan; Pradeep J Nathan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Dopamine and memory dedifferentiation in aging.

Authors:  Hunar Abdulrahman; Paul C Fletcher; Edward Bullmore; Alexa M Morcom
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Comparative Analysis of Dopaminergic and Cholinergic Mechanisms of Sensory and Sensorimotor Gating in Healthy Individuals and in Patients With Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Andrey T Proshin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Memory encoding and dopamine in the aging brain: a psychopharmacological neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Alexa M Morcom; Edward T Bullmore; Felicia A Huppert; Belinda Lennox; Asha Praseedom; Helen Linnington; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The computational anatomy of psychosis.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Klaas Enno Stephan; Harriet R Brown; Christopher D Frith; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Effects of dopaminergic modulation on electrophysiological brain response to affective stimuli.

Authors:  Ingmar H A Franken; Ilse Nijs; Lolke Pepplinkhuizen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.