Leah Li1, Chris Power. 1. Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK. L.Li@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetics and early environment are known to influence height, but evidence is sparse on changes in these influences over time. METHODS: The 1958 British birth cohort study includes all children born between March 3, 1958 and March 9, 1958, who were followed to age 41 yr, and one-third of their offspring in 1991. Childhood height in each generation (measured at 7 yr for cohort members and 4-18 yr for offspring) was converted to a standard deviation score based on the 1990 British growth reference. We used multilevel models to analyse influences on height in order to allow for the hierarchical within-family data structure. RESULTS: Childhood height increased by 1 cm between 1958 cohort members and their offspring. Several influences on childhood height in the older generation (maternal smoking, breastfeeding, maternal age, social class, maternal education, and parental divorce) did not affect childhood height in the younger generation. Parental height was most strongly associated with childhood height and effects did not diminish between generations [adjusted increase approximately 2 cm for 1 maternal or paternal height standard deviation score (SDS)]. Third- or later-borns and those with three or more siblings had deficits of 1-2 cm (adjusted estimates) in both generations. Other factors, particularly indicators of socioeconomic position, showed weaker effects in the younger generation. For example, the growth deficit of 1.1 cm (adjusted estimate) among cohort members from households with >1.5 persons/room had disappeared in the offspring. CONCLUSIONS: Within Great Britain, the adverse effects of environmental factors on childhood height have lessened between recent generations.
BACKGROUND: Genetics and early environment are known to influence height, but evidence is sparse on changes in these influences over time. METHODS: The 1958 British birth cohort study includes all children born between March 3, 1958 and March 9, 1958, who were followed to age 41 yr, and one-third of their offspring in 1991. Childhood height in each generation (measured at 7 yr for cohort members and 4-18 yr for offspring) was converted to a standard deviation score based on the 1990 British growth reference. We used multilevel models to analyse influences on height in order to allow for the hierarchical within-family data structure. RESULTS: Childhood height increased by 1 cm between 1958 cohort members and their offspring. Several influences on childhood height in the older generation (maternal smoking, breastfeeding, maternal age, social class, maternal education, and parental divorce) did not affect childhood height in the younger generation. Parental height was most strongly associated with childhood height and effects did not diminish between generations [adjusted increase approximately 2 cm for 1 maternal or paternal height standard deviation score (SDS)]. Third- or later-borns and those with three or more siblings had deficits of 1-2 cm (adjusted estimates) in both generations. Other factors, particularly indicators of socioeconomic position, showed weaker effects in the younger generation. For example, the growth deficit of 1.1 cm (adjusted estimate) among cohort members from households with >1.5 persons/room had disappeared in the offspring. CONCLUSIONS: Within Great Britain, the adverse effects of environmental factors on childhood height have lessened between recent generations.
Authors: Rita Patel; Debbie A Lawlor; Michael S Kramer; George Davey Smith; Natalia Bogdanovich; Lidia Matush; Richard M Martin Journal: Ann Hum Biol Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 1.533
Authors: Alicia Matijasevich; Laura D Howe; Kate Tilling; Iná S Santos; Aluísio J D Barros; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Valerie A McCormack; Peter McCarron; Laura D Howe; John Lynch; Debbie A Lawlor; George Davey Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura D Howe; Kate Tilling; Bruna Galobardes; George Davey Smith; David Gunnell; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 3.710