Literature DB >> 15358457

Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine growth retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low risk population: an observational study.

Joke M J Bais1, Martine Eskes, Maria Pel, Gouke J Bonsel, Otto P Bleker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of abdominal palpation as a screening test for intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) in a low risk population, under standard practice conditions. STUDY
DESIGN: Population based observational study of 6318 consecutive low risk singleton pregnancies. The Dutch obstetric system distinguishes low from high risk pregnancies. In the low risk group abdominal palpation as a screening test is performed by midwives. If a complication, like IUGR, during prenatal care is assessed, the women is referred to a consulted obstetrician. Ultrasound is performed by the consulted obstetrician. In case of sustained suspicion the women is selected as high risk. OUTCOME PARAMETERS: severe small for gestational age (SGA) birthweight below 2.3rd centile, all SGA birthweight below 10th centile, operative delivery, neonatal morbidity and perinatal mortality. Screening value of abdominal palpation, abdominal palpation combined with ultrasound, and the performance of high risk selection was assessed by conventional performance measures.
RESULTS: Abdominal palpation as a screening test for IUGR is of limited value: the observed sensitivities were 28% for severe SGA and 21% for SGA p < or = 10, respectively. After ultrasound in case of sustained suspicion, the sensitivity in detection of severe SGA was 25% and positive predictive value (PPV) 16%. In detection of SGA p < or = 10 sensitivity was 15% and PPV 55%, which means 45% were false positives. The sensitivity of the Dutch obstetric system in selection of high risk pregnancies in detection of severe SGA was 53%, in detection of SGA p < or = 10 was 37%. Perinatal mortality was 0.9% (57/6318) and 32% of these cases were SGA. Six cases of fetal death were unrecognised during prenatal care (0.09%) and seem preventable. The prevalence of a 5 min Apgar Score < or = 7 was significantly higher in the SGA infants if SGA was defined as p < or = 10.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of abdominal palpation as a screening test for IUGR detection in a low risk population is disappointing. However, various stratagems such as routine ultrasound do not improve detection rate or perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15358457     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  15 in total

1.  Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Sinja Alexandra Ernst; Tilman Brand; Stefan K Lhachimi; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  First-trimester placental ultrasound and maternal serum markers as predictors of small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Nadav Schwartz; Mary D Sammel; Rita Leite; Samuel Parry
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The utility of ultrasound surveillance of fluid and growth in obese women.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Victoria C Jauk; John Owen; Joseph R Biggio
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The use of angiogenic biomarkers in maternal blood to identify which SGA fetuses will require a preterm delivery and mothers who will develop pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Amy E Whitten; Steven J Korzeniewski; Piya Chaemsaithong; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth.

Authors:  Japaraj Robert Peter; Jacqueline J Ho; Jayabalan Valliapan; Subramaniam Sivasangari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-08

6.  Screening for fetal growth restriction using ultrasound and the sFLT1/PlGF ratio in nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Francesca Gaccioli; Ulla Sovio; Emma Cook; Martin Hund; D Stephen Charnock-Jones; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-06-19

7.  Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sinja Alexandra Ernst; Anna Reeske; Jacob Spallek; Knud Petersen; Tilman Brand; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Relationship between maternal hypoglycaemia and small-for-gestational-age infants according to maternal weight status: a retrospective cohort study in two hospitals.

Authors:  Satoshi Shinohara; Yuzo Uchida; Mitsuo Hirai; Shuji Hirata; Kohta Suzuki
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study).

Authors:  Jens Henrichs; Viki Verfaille; Laura Viester; Myrte Westerneng; Bert Molewijk; Arie Franx; Henriette van der Horst; Judith E Bosmans; Ank de Jonge; Petra Jellema
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ulla Sovio; Ian R White; Alison Dacey; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.