Literature DB >> 15358046

Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines.

Scott M Grundy, James I Cleeman, C Noel Bairey Merz, H Bryan Brewer, Luther T Clark, Donald B Hunninghake, Richard C Pasternak, Sidney C Smith, Neil J Stone.   

Abstract

The Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program issued an evidence-based set of guidelines on cholesterol management in 2001. Since the publication of ATP III, 5 major clinical trials of statin therapy with clinical end points have been published. These trials addressed issues that were not examined in previous clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The present document reviews the results of these recent trials and assesses their implications for cholesterol management. Therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) remain an essential modality in clinical management. The trials confirm the benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy in high-risk patients and support the ATP III treatment goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL. They support the inclusion of patients with diabetes in the high-risk category and confirm the benefits of LDL-lowering therapy in these patients. They further confirm that older persons benefit from therapeutic lowering of LDL-C. The major recommendations for modifications to footnote the ATP III treatment algorithm are the following. In high-risk persons, the recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL, but when risk is very high, an LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL is a therapeutic option, ie, a reasonable clinical strategy, on the basis of available clinical trial evidence. This therapeutic option extends also to patients at very high risk who have a baseline LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. Moreover, when a high-risk patient has high triglycerides or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), consideration can be given to combining a fibrate or nicotinic acid with an LDL-lowering drug. For moderately high-risk persons (2+ risk factors and 10-year risk 10% to 20%), the recommended LDL-C goal is <130 mg/dL, but an LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL is a therapeutic option on the basis of recent trial evidence. The latter option extends also to moderately high-risk persons with a baseline LDL-C of 100 to 129 mg/dL. When LDL-lowering drug therapy is employed in high-risk or moderately high-risk persons, it is advised that intensity of therapy be sufficient to achieve at least a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-C levels. Moreover, any person at high risk or moderately high risk who has lifestyle-related risk factors (eg, obesity, physical inactivity, elevated triglycerides, low HDL-C, or metabolic syndrome) is a candidate for TLC to modify these risk factors regardless of LDL-C level. Finally, for people in lower-risk categories, recent clinical trials do not modify the goals and cutpoints of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15358046     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  338 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular disease and primary ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Melissa Wellons
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 2.  Short-term vascular risk: time to take notice?

Authors:  Liam Smeeth; Aroon D Hingorani
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  [New aspects of perioperative statin therapy].

Authors:  N Butte; B W Böttiger; O Liakopoulos; P Teschendorf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Assessment of potential pharmacokinetic interactions of ezetimibe/simvastatin and extended-release niacin tablets in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Teddy Kosoglou; Yali Zhu; Paul Statkevich; Ilias Triantafyllou; William Taggart; Fengjuan Xuan; Kenneth T Kim; David L Cutler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Assessing cardiovascular risk in Mediterranean women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  M Rizzo; R A Longo; E Guastella; G B Rini; E Carmina
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Personalised medicine in hypercholesterolaemia: the role of pharmacogenetics in statin therapy.

Authors:  Najmeh Ahangari; Mohammad Doosti; Majid Ghayour Mobarhan; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Gordon A Ferns; Alireza Pasdar
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.709

7.  Flaxseed and/or hesperidin supplementation in metabolic syndrome: an open-labeled randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zahra Yari; Makan Cheraghpour; Azita Hekmatdoost
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Investigation of Motivational Interviewing and Prevention Consults to Achieve Cardiovascular Targets (IMPACT) trial.

Authors:  Eugenia Gianos; Antoinette Schoenthaler; Yu Guo; Judy Zhong; Howard Weintraub; Arthur Schwartzbard; James Underberg; Michael Schloss; Jonathan D Newman; Sean Heffron; Edward A Fisher; Jeffrey S Berger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Are investments in disease prevention complements? The case of statins and health behaviors.

Authors:  Robert Kaestner; Michael Darden; Darius Lakdawalla
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 10.  Targeting LDL Cholesterol: Beyond Absolute Goals Toward Personalized Risk.

Authors:  Morton Leibowitz; Chandra Cohen-Stavi; Sanjay Basu; Ran D Balicer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.