Literature DB >> 15357285

A method for comparing multiple bacterial community structures from 16S rDNA clone library sequences.

Inae Hur1, Jongsik Chun.   

Abstract

Culture-independent approaches, based on 16S rDNA sequences, are extensively used in modern microbial ecology. Sequencing of the clone library generated from environmental DNA has advantages over fingerprint-based methods, such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, as it provides precise identification and quantification of the phylotypes present in samples. However, to date, no method exists for comparing multiple bacterial community structures using clone library sequences. In this study, an automated method to achieve this has been developed, by applying pair wise alignment, hierarchical clustering and principle component analysis. The method has been demonstrated to be successful in comparing samples from various environments. The program, named CommCluster, was written in JAVA, and is now freely available, at http://chunlab.snu.ac.kr/commcluster/.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15357285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol        ISSN: 1225-8873            Impact factor:   3.422


  12 in total

1.  Bacterial biodiversity from Roopkund Glacier, Himalayan mountain ranges, India.

Authors:  Suman Pradhan; T N R Srinivas; Pavan Kumar Pindi; K Hara Kishore; Z Begum; Pawan Kumar Singh; Ashish Kumar Singh; M S Pratibha; Arun K Yasala; G S N Reddy; S Shivaji
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Bacterial diversity of soil in the vicinity of Pindari glacier, Himalayan mountain ranges, India, using culturable bacteria and soil 16S rRNA gene clones.

Authors:  S Shivaji; M S Pratibha; B Sailaja; K Hara Kishore; Ashish K Singh; Z Begum; Uttam Anarasi; S R Prabagaran; G S N Reddy; T N R Srinivas
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Introducing TreeClimber, a test to compare microbial community structures.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of bacterial diversity in proglacial soil from Kafni Glacier, Himalayan Mountain ranges, India, with the bacterial diversity of other glaciers in the world.

Authors:  T N R Srinivas; S M Singh; Suman Pradhan; M S Pratibha; K Hara Kishore; Ashish K Singh; Z Begum; S R Prabagaran; G S N Reddy; S Shivaji
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Pyrosequencing analysis of roof-harvested rainwater and river water used for domestic purposes in Luthengele village in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.

Authors:  Lizyben Chidamba; Lise Korsten
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Comparison and characterization of microbial communities in sulfide-rich wastewater with and without propidium monoazide treatment.

Authors:  Wei-Tie Lin; Jian-Fei Luo; Yong Guo
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Assessment of microbial communities by graph partitioning in a study of soil fungi in two Alpine meadows.

Authors:  L Zinger; E Coissac; P Choler; R A Geremia
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Sphagnum mosses harbour highly specific bacterial diversity during their whole lifecycle.

Authors:  Anastasia Bragina; Christian Berg; Massimiliano Cardinale; Andrey Shcherbakov; Vladimir Chebotar; Gabriele Berg
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities.

Authors:  Catherine Lozupone; Rob Knight
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The oligonucleotide frequency derived error gradient and its application to the binning of metagenome fragments.

Authors:  Isaam Saeed; Saman K Halgamuge
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.