Literature DB >> 1535726

Small area analysis of surgery for low-back pain.

E Volinn1, J Mayer, P Diehr, D Van Koevering, F A Connell, J D Loeser.   

Abstract

Rates of spine surgery (discectomy, laminectomy, fusion) vary several-fold among "small areas" such as counties or hospital market areas. To ascertain why this is so, an analysis was conducted of variability in rates among counties in the State of Washington (N = 39). Since, unlike previous published reports, this study excluded patients with cancer, major trauma, and infection, as well as those with cervical and thoracic procedures, rates in this study pertain specifically to the problem of low-back pain. Six classes of variables to explain variability among county rates were defined: I) percentage of the labor force in heavy labor and transportation occupations; II) socioeconomic conditions; III) neurologic and orthopedic surgeon density; IV) occupancy rate of back surgery hospitals; V) primary payer and VI) health care availability. In all, the effect of 28 explanatory variables was tested. In doing so, the authors took into account the possibility of spurious correlation. The rate of surgery for low-back pain varied nearly 15-fold among counties. The explanatory variables that were tested, however, accounted for only a minor part of the variability. The hypothesis that "physician practice style factor" accounts for the major part is explored; potential properties of practice style factor are specified for further testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1535726     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199205000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  Hospital pricing reform in the public health care system--an empirical case study from Finland.

Authors:  Hennamari Mikkola
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2003-12

2.  What is chronic pain?

Authors:  J D Loeser
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1991-09

Review 3.  Development of appropriateness criteria for the surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS).

Authors:  A F Mannion; V Pittet; F Steiger; J-P Vader; H-J Becker; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Drivers of surgery for the degenerative hip, knee, and spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Charles D Rosen; Nitin N Bhatia; P Douglas Kiester; Ranjan Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems.

Authors:  J N Lavis; A Malter; G M Anderson; V M Taylor; R A Deyo; C Bombardier; T Axcell; W Kreuter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Identifying neck and back pain in administrative data: defining the right cohort.

Authors:  Patricia L Sinnott; Andrew M Siroka; Andrea C Shane; Jodie A Trafton; Todd H Wagner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The Effect of Healthcare Provider Availability on Spine Spending.

Authors:  Benjamin A Y Cher; Olga Yakusheva; Haiyin Liu; Julie P W Bynum; Matthew A Davis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Minimally invasive arthrodesis for chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction using the SImmetry SI Joint Fusion system.

Authors:  Larry E Miller; Jon E Block
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-05-07

10.  Diagnosis and Characters of Non-Specific Low Back Pain in Japan: The Yamaguchi Low Back Pain Study.

Authors:  Hidenori Suzuki; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yasuaki Imajo; Yuichiro Yoshida; Norihiro Nishida; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.