Literature DB >> 15356435

[Dioxin emissions and soft-tissue sarcoma: results of a population-based case-control study].

N Floret1, F Mauny, B Challier, J-Y Cahn, F Tourneux, J-F Viel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1998, the French Ministry of Environment revealed that of 71 French municipal solid waste incinerators processing more than 6 metric tons of material per hour, dioxin emission from 15 of them was above the 10 ng international toxic equivalency factor/m3 (including Besançon, emitting 16.3 ng international toxic equivalency factor/m3) which is substantially higher than the 0.1 international toxic equivalency factor/m3 prescribed by a European directive of 1994. In 2000, a macrospatial epidemiological study undertaken in the administrative district of Doubs, identified two significant clusters of soft-tissue sarcoma and non Hodgkin lymphoma in the vicinity of the municipal solid waste incinerator of Besançon. This microspatial study (at the Besançon city scale), was designed to test the association between the exposure to dioxins emitted by the municipal solid waste incinerator of Besançon and the risk of soft-tissue sarcoma.
METHODS: Ground-level concentrations of dioxin were modeled with a dispersion model (Air Pollution Control 3 software). Four increasing zones of exposure were defined. For each case of soft tissue sarcoma, ten controls were randomly selected from the 1990 census database and matched for gender and age. A geographic information system allowed the attribution of a dioxin concentration category to cases and controls, according to their place of residence.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven cases of soft tissue sarcoma were identified by the Doubs cancer registry between 1980 and 1995, corresponding to a standardized incidence (French population) of 2.44 per 100,000 inhabitants. Compared with the least exposed zone, the risk of developing a soft tissue sarcoma was not significantly increased for people living in the more exposed zones.
CONCLUSION: Before definitely concluding that there is no relationship between the exposure to dioxin released by a solid waste incinerator and soft tissue sarcoma, a nationwide investigation based on other registries should be conducted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15356435     DOI: 10.1016/s0398-7620(04)99047-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique        ISSN: 0398-7620            Impact factor:   1.019


  5 in total

Review 1.  Health effects associated with the disposal of solid waste in landfills and incinerators in populations living in surrounding areas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amalia Mattiello; Paolo Chiodini; Elvira Bianco; Nunzia Forgione; Incoronata Flammia; Ciro Gallo; Renato Pizzuti; Salvatore Panico
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 2.  Environmental factors in causing human cancers: emphasis on tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Umesh T Sankpal; Hima Pius; Moeez Khan; Mohammed I Shukoor; Pius Maliakal; Chris M Lee; Maen Abdelrahim; Sarah F Connelly; Riyaz Basha
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-05-22

3.  Methodological issues in descriptive environmental epidemiology. The example of study Sentieri.

Authors:  Catalina Ciocan; Nicolò Franco; Enrico Pira; Ihab Mansour; Alessandro Godono; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.275

Review 4.  Risk Factors for Occurrence and Relapse of Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Pia Weskamp; Dominic Ufton; Marius Drysch; Johannes Maximilian Wagner; Mehran Dadras; Marcus Lehnhardt; Björn Behr; Christoph Wallner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Sarcoma risk and dioxin emissions from incinerators and industrial plants: a population-based case-control study (Italy).

Authors:  Paola Zambon; Paolo Ricci; Emanuela Bovo; Alessandro Casula; Massimo Gattolin; Anna Rita Fiore; Francesco Chiosi; Stefano Guzzinati
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 5.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.