Literature DB >> 15355562

Possible roles of Runx1 and Sox9 in incipient intramembranous ossification.

Takashi Yamashiro1, Xiu-Ping Wang, Zhe Li, Shinji Oya, Thomas Aberg, Tomohiro Fukunaga, Hiroshi Kamioka, Nancy A Speck, Teruko Takano-Yamamoto, Irma Thesleff.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the detailed expression patterns of Runx1 and Sox9 in various types of bone formation, and determined whether Runx1 expression was affected by Runx2 deficiency and Runx2 expression by Runx1 deficiency. Our results indicate that both Runx1 and Sox9 are intensely expressed in the future osteogenic cell compartment and in cartilage. The pattern of Runx1 and Sox9 expression suggests that both genes could potentially be involved in incipient intramembranous bone formation during craniofacial development.
INTRODUCTION: Runx1, a gene essential for hematopoiesis, contains RUNX binding sites in its promoter region, suggesting possible cross-regulation with Runx2 and potential regulatory roles in bone development. On the other hand, Sox9 is essential for chondrogenesis, and haploinsufficiency of Sox9 leads to premature ossification of the skeletal system. In this study, we studied the possible roles of Runx1 and Sox9 in bone development.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Runx1, Runx2/Osf2, and Sox9 expression was evaluated by in situ hybridization in the growing craniofacial bones of embryonic day (E)12-16 mice and in the endochondral bone-forming regions of embryonic and postnatal long bones. In addition, we evaluated Runx2/Osf2 expression in the growing face of Runx1 knockout mice at E12.5 and Runx1 expression in Runx2 knockout mice at E14.5.
RESULTS: Runx1 and Sox9 were expressed in cartilage, and the regions of expression expanded to the neighboring Runx2-expressing osteogenic regions. Expression of both Runx1 and Sox9 was markedly downregulated on ossification. Runx1 and Sox9 expression was absent in the regions of endochondral bone formation and in actively modeling or remodeling bone tissues in the long bones as well as in ossified craniofacial bones. Runx2 expression was not affected by gene disruption of Runx1, whereas the expression domains of Runx1 were extended in Runx2(-/-) mice compared with wildtype mice.
CONCLUSIONS: Runx1 and Sox9 are specifically expressed in the osteogenic cell compartments in the craniofacial bones and the bone collar of long bones, and this expression is downregulated on terminal differentiation of osteoblasts. Our results suggest that Runx1 may play a role in incipient intramembranous bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15355562     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.040801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  13 in total

1.  Dominance of SOX9 function over RUNX2 during skeletogenesis.

Authors:  Guang Zhou; Qiping Zheng; Feyza Engin; Elda Munivez; Yuqing Chen; Eiman Sebald; Deborah Krakow; Brendan Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effect of conditional inactivation of beta 1 integrins using twist 2 Cre, Osterix Cre and osteocalcin Cre lines on skeletal phenotype.

Authors:  Asha Shekaran; James T Shoemaker; Taylor E Kavanaugh; Angela S Lin; Michelle C LaPlaca; Yuhong Fan; Robert E Guldberg; Andrés J García
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Runx1 and Runx3 Are Downstream Effectors of Nanog in Promoting Osteogenic Differentiation of the Mouse Mesenchymal Cell Line C3H10T1/2.

Authors:  Tadahito Saito; Shinsuke Ohba; Fumiko Yano; Ichiro Seto; Yoshiyuki Yonehara; Tsuyoshi Takato; Toru Ogasawara
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 4.  Sox9 function in craniofacial development and disease.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Lee; Jean-Pierre Saint-Jeannet
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Human disease modeling reveals integrated transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency.

Authors:  Christina V Theodoris; Molong Li; Mark P White; Lei Liu; Daniel He; Katherine S Pollard; Benoit G Bruneau; Deepak Srivastava
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Suppression of chondrogenesis by Id helix-loop-helix proteins in murine embryonic orofacial tissue.

Authors:  Partha Mukhopadhyay; Francine Rezzoug; Cynthia L Webb; M Michele Pisano; Robert M Greene
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.880

7.  Runx1 up-regulates chondrocyte to osteoblast lineage commitment and promotes bone formation by enhancing both chondrogenesis and osteogenesis.

Authors:  Chen-Yi Tang; Wei Chen; Yuan Luo; Jinjin Wu; Yan Zhang; Abigail McVicar; Matthew McConnell; Yuehua Liu; Hou-De Zhou; Yi-Ping Li
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms of intermuscular bone development in fish: a review.

Authors:  Bo Li; Yuan-Wei Zhang; Xiao Liu; Li Ma; Jun-Xing Yang
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  The SOX9 upstream region prone to chromosomal aberrations causing campomelic dysplasia contains multiple cartilage enhancers.

Authors:  Baojin Yao; Qiuqing Wang; Chia-Feng Liu; Pallavi Bhattaram; Wei Li; Timothy J Mead; James F Crish; Véronique Lefebvre
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  The Unmixing Problem: A Guide to Applying Single-Cell RNA Sequencing to Bone.

Authors:  Matthew B Greenblatt; Noriaki Ono; Ugur M Ayturk; Shawon Debnath; Sarfaraz Lalani
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.