Literature DB >> 15355471

The CD63 basophil activation test in Hymenoptera venom allergy: a prospective study.

G J Sturm1, E Böhm, M Trummer, I Weiglhofer, A Heinemann, W Aberer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The basophil activation test (BAT), which relies on flow cytometric quantitation of the allergen-induced up-regulation of the granule-associated marker CD63 in peripheral blood basophils, has been suggested to be a useful approach in detecting responsiveness to allergens. The purpose of this study was to establish the usefulness of the BAT with regard to the clinical history and current diagnostic tools in Hymenoptera venom allergy using a prospective study design.
METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients allergic to Hymenoptera venom as defined by a systemic reaction after an insect sting, and 30 age- and sex-matched control subjects with a negative history were included. The degree and nature of sensitization was confirmed by skin testing, specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), serum tryptase levels and BAT. In the nonallergic control group only analysis of specific IgE and BAT were performed. Correlation of BAT, skin test and specific IgE, respectively, with the clinical history in the allergic group was termed as sensitivity and in the control group as specificity.
RESULTS: Twenty one of 23 (91.3%) bee venom allergic patients and 29 of 34 (85.3%) patients allergic to wasp and hornet venom tested positive in BAT. The overall sensitivity of BAT, specific IgE and skin tests were 87.7, 91.2 and 93.0%, respectively. The overall specificities were 86.7% for BAT and 66.7% for specific IgE. No correlation between the severity of clinical symptoms and the magnitude of basophil activation was observed.
CONCLUSION: The BAT seems to be an appropriate method to identify patients allergic to bee or wasp venom with a comparable sensitivity to standard diagnostic regimens. The higher specificity of BAT as compared with specific IgE makes this test a useful tool in the diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15355471     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  21 in total

1.  [Cellular in-vitro assays. Applicability in daily routine].

Authors:  B Wedi; A Kapp
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Diclofenac induces basophil degranulation without increasing CD63 expression in sensitive patients.

Authors:  A Malbrán; E Yeyati; G L Rey; N Galassi
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Diagnostic value of the basophil activation test in evaluating Hymenoptera venom sensitization.

Authors:  Andreja Peternelj; Mira Silar; Nissera Bajrovic; Katja Adamic; Ema Music; Mitja Kosnik; Peter Korosec
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  [Immunologic control parameters during specific immunotherapy].

Authors:  H Ott; M Wosnitza; H F Merk
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  [Tricky cases in in-vitro diagnostics of hymenoptera venom allergy].

Authors:  S Müller; D Rafei-Shamsabadi; T Jakob
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 6.  Pros and Cons of Clinical Basophil Testing (BAT).

Authors:  Hans Jürgen Hoffmann; Edward F Knol; Martha Ferrer; Lina Mayorga; Vito Sabato; Alexandra F Santos; Bernadette Eberlein; Anna Nopp; Donald MacGlashan
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 7.  Clinical immunology review series: an approach to the use of the immunology laboratory in the diagnosis of clinical allergy.

Authors:  P Williams; W A C Sewell; C Bunn; R Pumphrey; G Read; S Jolles
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Effect of in vitro aspirin stimulation on basophils in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.

Authors:  G E Celik; J T Schroeder; R G Hamilton; S S Saini; N F Adkinson
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 5.018

9.  Inconsistent results of diagnostic tools hamper the differentiation between bee and vespid venom allergy.

Authors:  Gunter J Sturm; Chunsheng Jin; Bettina Kranzelbinder; Wolfgang Hemmer; Eva M Sturm; Antonia Griesbacher; Akos Heinemann; Jutta Vollmann; Friedrich Altmann; Karl Crailsheim; Margarete Focke; Werner Aberer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Basophil activation test compared to skin prick test and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay for aeroallergen-specific Immunoglobulin-E.

Authors:  Faisal M Khan; Aito Ueno-Yamanouchi; Bazir Serushago; Tom Bowen; Andrew W Lyon; Cathy Lu; Jan Storek
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.