Literature DB >> 15355168

Estimating retest effects in longitudinal assessments of cognitive functioning in adults between 18 and 60 years of age.

Timothy A Salthouse1, David H Schroeder, Emilio Ferrer.   

Abstract

Several analyses were conducted on data from samples of adults between 18 and 58 years of age who completed the same cognitive tests after an interval ranging from less than 1 week to 35 years. Because the retest interval varied across individuals, it was possible to determine the length of time needed before the gains associated with a retest decreased to 0 and to obtain simultaneous estimates of the magnitude of effects associated with increased age and a prior assessment. The results indicated that for adults within this age range, 7 or more years were needed before positive retest effects were no longer detectable. Age effects in longitudinal comparisons could be interpreted in terms of large positive effects associated with a prior assessment and negative effects associated with age that were comparable in magnitude to those observed in cross-sectional comparisons. Copyright 2004 American Psychological Association

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15355168     DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  51 in total

1.  On the confounds among retest gains and age-cohort differences in the estimation of within-person change in longitudinal studies: a simulation study.

Authors:  Lesa Hoffman; Scott M Hofer; Martin J Sliwinski
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-05-30

2.  Responses to Commentaries by Finch, Abrams, Nilsson, et al. and Schaie.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Do Subjective Memory Complaints Lead or Follow Objective Cognitive Change? A Five-Year Population Study of Temporal Influence.

Authors:  Beth E Snitz; Brent J Small; Tianxiu Wang; Chung-Chou H Chang; Tiffany F Hughes; Mary Ganguli
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Jump, Hop, or Skip: Modeling Practice Effects in Studies of Determinants of Cognitive Change in Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexandre Vivot; Melinda C Power; M Maria Glymour; Elizabeth R Mayeda; Andreana Benitez; Avron Spiro; Jennifer J Manly; Cécile Proust-Lima; Carole Dufouil; Alden L Gross
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Robust cognitive change.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Multivariate modeling of age and retest in longitudinal studies of cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Emilio Ferrer; Timothy A Salthouse; John J McArdle; Walter F Stewart; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-09

7.  Pilot age and expertise predict flight simulator performance: a 3-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Joy L Taylor; Quinn Kennedy; Art Noda; Jerome A Yesavage
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  When does age-related cognitive decline begin?

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Implications of short-term retest effects for the interpretation of longitudinal change.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; Elliot M Tucker-Drob
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Retest effects in working memory capacity tests: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jana Scharfen; Katrin Jansen; Heinz Holling
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.