Literature DB >> 15354695

Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: how and why?

Richard R Plant1, Nick Hammond, Garry Turner.   

Abstract

With the proliferation of commercial experiment generators and custom software within cognitive psychology and the behavioral sciences, many have assumed that issues regarding millisecond timing accuracy have been largely solved. However, through empirical investigation of a variety of paradigms, we have discovered numerous sources of timing error. These can range from poor scripting practices, to incorrect timing specifications, to hardware variability. Building upon earlier research, we have developed a commercial device and associated software that enables researchers to benchmark most computer-based paradigms in situ and without modification. This gives them the opportunity to correct timing errors where practicable, increase replicability, and reduce variability by altering onset times for stimuli, by replacing inaccurate hardware, or by post hoc statistical manipulation should the source of error be constant. We outline the features of the device and accompanying software suite, stress the importance of such independent validation, and highlight typical areas that can be subject to error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15354695     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  14 in total

1.  PyEPL: a cross-platform experiment-programming library.

Authors:  Aaron S Geller; Ian K Schlefer; Per B Sederberg; Joshua Jacobs; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-11

2.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Russell M Bauer; Grant L Iverson; Alison N Cernich; Laurence M Binder; Ronald M Ruff; Richard I Naugle
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Russell M Bauer; Grant L Iverson; Alison N Cernich; Laurence M Binder; Ronald M Ruff; Richard I Naugle
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Could millisecond timing errors in commonly used equipment be a cause of replication failure in some neuroscience studies?

Authors:  Richard R Plant; Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  Presentation and response timing accuracy in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web experiments.

Authors:  Stian Reimers; Neil Stewart
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-06

6.  The influence of vocal training and acting experience on measures of voice quality and emotional genuineness.

Authors:  Steven R Livingstone; Deanna H Choi; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-07

7.  Measuring software timing errors in the presentation of visual stimuli in cognitive neuroscience experiments.

Authors:  Pablo Garaizar; Miguel A Vadillo; Diego López-de-Ipiña; Helena Matute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Accuracy and precision of visual stimulus timing in PsychoPy: no timing errors in standard usage.

Authors:  Pablo Garaizar; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Eye Tracking Research and Technology: Towards Objective Measurement of Data Quality.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-07

10.  Presentation accuracy of the web revisited: animation methods in the HTML5 era.

Authors:  Pablo Garaizar; Miguel A Vadillo; Diego López-de-Ipiña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.