Literature DB >> 15353693

International intercomparison for criticality dosimetry: the case of biological dosimetry.

L Roy1, V Buard, M Delbos, V Durand, N Paillole, E Grégoire, P Voisin.   

Abstract

The Institute of Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) organized a biological dosimetry international intercomparison with the purpose of comparing (i) dicentrics yield produced in human lymphocytes; (ii) the gamma and neutron dose estimate according to the corresponding laboratory calibration curve. The experimental reactor SILENE was used with different configurations: bare source 4 Gy, lead shield 1 and 2 Gy and a 60Co source 2 Gy. An increasing variation of dicentric yield per cell was observed between participants when there were more damages in the samples. Doses were derived from the observed dicentric rates according to the dose-effect relationship provided by each laboratory. Differences in dicentric rate values are more important than those in the corresponding dose values. The doses obtained by the participants were found to be in agreement with the given physical dose within 20%. The evaluation of the respective gamma and neutron dose was achieved only by four laboratories, with some small variations among them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15353693     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  Marcela Maria Pereira de Lemos Pinto; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Santos; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Radiation signature on exposed cells: Relevance in dose estimation.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Perumal; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Venkateswarlu Raavi; Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen; Karthik Kanagaraj; Amith Roy Chowdhury; Solomon Fd Paul
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-28

3.  Evaluation of the annual Canadian biodosimetry network intercomparisons.

Authors:  Ruth C Wilkins; Lindsay A Beaton-Green; Sylvie Lachapelle; Barbara C Kutzner; Catherine Ferrarotto; Vinita Chauhan; Leonora Marro; Gordon K Livingston; Hillary Boulay Greene; Farrah N Flegal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Intercomparison in Cytogenetic Dosimetry among 22 Laboratories in China.

Authors:  Jian Xiang Liu; Yan Pan; Jian Lei Ruan; Chunnan Piao; Xu Su
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2016-12-30

5.  Dose-response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals.

Authors:  Yu Abe; Mitsuaki A Yoshida; Kurumi Fujioka; Yumiko Kurosu; Risa Ujiie; Aki Yanagi; Naohiro Tsuyama; Tomisato Miura; Toshiya Inaba; Kenji Kamiya; Akira Sakai
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Calibration curves by 60Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation - a comparative study.

Authors:  Mariana Esposito Mendes; Julyanne Conceição Goes de Mendonça; Suy Hwang; Marina Di Giorgio; Fabiana Farias de Lima; Neide Santos
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 1.771

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.