Literature DB >> 15353168

Taste-aversion-prone (TAP) rats and taste-aversion-resistant (TAR) rats differ in ethanol self-administration, but not in ethanol clearance or general consumption.

T Edward Orr1, Jennifer L Whitford-Stoddard, Ralph L Elkins.   

Abstract

Taste-aversion (TA)-prone (TAP) rats and TA-resistant (TAR) rats have been developed by means of bidirectional selective breeding on the basis of their behavioral responses to a TA conditioning paradigm. The TA conditioning involved the pairing of an emetic-class agent (cyclophosphamide) with a novel saccharin solution as the conditioned stimulus. Despite the absence of ethanol in the selective breeding process, these rat lines differ widely in ethanol self-administration. In the current study, blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) were determined after 9 days of limited (2 h per day) access to a simultaneous, two-bottle choice of a 10% ethanol in water solution [volume/volume (vol./vol.)] or plain water. The BACs correlated highly with ethanol intake among TAR rats, but an insufficient number of TAP rats yielded measurable BACs to make the same comparison within this rat line. The same rats were subsequently exposed to 24-h access of a two-bottle choice (10% ethanol or plain water) for 8 days. Ethanol consumption during the 24-h access period correlated highly with that seen during limited access. Subsequent TA conditioning with these rats yielded line-typical differences in saccharin preferences. In a separate group of rats, ethanol clearance was determined by measuring BACs at 1, 4, and 7 h after injection of a 2.5-g/kg dose of ethanol. Ethanol clearance was not different between the two lines. Furthermore, the lines did not differ with respect to food and water consumption. Therefore, the TAP rat-TAR rat differences in ethanol consumption cannot be attributed to line differences in ethanol metabolism or in general consummatory behavior. The findings support our contention that the line differences in ethanol consumption are mediated by differences in TA-related mechanisms. The findings are discussed with respect to genetically based differences in the subjective experience of ethanol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15353168     DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2004.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol        ISSN: 0741-8329            Impact factor:   2.405


  9 in total

Review 1.  Rat animal models for screening medications to treat alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Richard L Bell; Sheketha R Hauser; Tiebing Liang; Youssef Sari; Antoniette Maldonado-Devincci; Zachary A Rodd
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Sex differences in the effects of ethanol pre-exposure during adolescence on ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in adult rats.

Authors:  Luke K Sherrill; Claire Berthold; Wendy A Koss; Janice M Juraska; Joshua M Gulley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A comparison between taste avoidance and conditioned disgust reactions induced by ethanol and lithium chloride in preweanling rats.

Authors:  Carlos Arias; Ricardo Marcos Pautassi; Juan Carlos Molina; Norman E Spear
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 4.  Impact of the Aversive Effects of Drugs on Their Use and Abuse.

Authors:  Anthony L Riley; Hayley N Manke; Shihui Huang
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.112

5.  Liquid-diet with alcohol alters maternal, fetal and placental weights and the expression of molecules involved in integrin signaling in the fetal cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Ujjwal K Rout; Julie M Dhossche
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Scheduled access alcohol drinking by alcohol-preferring (P) and high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) rats: modeling adolescent and adult binge-like drinking.

Authors:  Richard L Bell; Zachary A Rodd; Eric A Engleman; Jamie E Toalston; William J McBride
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 7.  Ethanol drinking in rodents: is free-choice drinking related to the reinforcing effects of ethanol?

Authors:  Alexis S Green; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.405

8.  Genotype modulates age-related alterations in sensitivity to the aversive effects of ethanol: an eight inbred strain analysis of conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  E M Moore; R D Forrest; S L Boehm
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.449

9.  Ethanol Conditioned Taste Aversion in High Drinking in the Dark Mice.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Pamela Metten; Antonia M Savarese; Angela R Ozburn; Jason P Schlumbohm; Stephanie E Spence; Wyatt R Hack
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-01-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.