OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in spatial extent and metabolic activity in a comparison of a radiosurgical target defined by conventional strategies that utilize the enhancing lesion and a metabolic lesion defined by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) imaging. The authors evaluated whether these differences manifest themselves in the clinical outcome of patients and assessed the value of incorporating 1H-MRS imaging-derived spatial information into the treatment planning process for gamma knife surgery (GKS). METHODS: Twenty-six patients harboring Grade IV gliomas who had previously been treated with external-beam radiation therapy were evaluated by comparing the radiosurgically treated lesion volume with the volume of metabolically active tumor defined on 1H-MRS imaging. The cohort was evenly divided into two groups based on the percentage of overlap between the radiosurgical target and the metabolic lesion volumes. Patients with a percentage of overlap greater than 50% with respect to the metabolic lesion volume were classified as low risk and those with an overlap less than 50% were classified as high risk. Kaplan-Meier estimators were calculated using time to progression and survival as dependent variables. The metabolite levels within the metabolic lesion were significantly greater than those within the radiosurgical target (p < or = 0.001). The median survival was 15.7 months for patients in the low-risk group and 10.4 months for those in the high-risk group. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the results of this study indicates that patients undergoing GKS may benefit from the inclusion of 1H-MRS imaging in the treatment planning process.
OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in spatial extent and metabolic activity in a comparison of a radiosurgical target defined by conventional strategies that utilize the enhancing lesion and a metabolic lesion defined by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) imaging. The authors evaluated whether these differences manifest themselves in the clinical outcome of patients and assessed the value of incorporating 1H-MRS imaging-derived spatial information into the treatment planning process for gamma knife surgery (GKS). METHODS: Twenty-six patients harboring Grade IV gliomas who had previously been treated with external-beam radiation therapy were evaluated by comparing the radiosurgically treated lesion volume with the volume of metabolically active tumor defined on 1H-MRS imaging. The cohort was evenly divided into two groups based on the percentage of overlap between the radiosurgical target and the metabolic lesion volumes. Patients with a percentage of overlap greater than 50% with respect to the metabolic lesion volume were classified as low risk and those with an overlap less than 50% were classified as high risk. Kaplan-Meier estimators were calculated using time to progression and survival as dependent variables. The metabolite levels within the metabolic lesion were significantly greater than those within the radiosurgical target (p < or = 0.001). The median survival was 15.7 months for patients in the low-risk group and 10.4 months for those in the high-risk group. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the results of this study indicates that patients undergoing GKS may benefit from the inclusion of 1H-MRS imaging in the treatment planning process.
Authors: N Andres Parra; Andrew A Maudsley; Rakesh K Gupta; Fazilat Ishkanian; Kris Huang; Gail R Walker; Kyle Padgett; Bhaswati Roy; Joseph Panoff; Arnold Markoe; Radka Stoyanova Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Travis C Salzillo; Jingzhe Hu; Linda Nguyen; Nicholas Whiting; Jaehyuk Lee; Joseph Weygand; Prasanta Dutta; Shivanand Pudakalakatti; Niki Zacharias Millward; Seth T Gammon; Frederick F Lang; Amy B Heimberger; Pratip K Bhattacharya Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.266
Authors: Christina Tsien; Craig J Galbán; Thomas L Chenevert; Timothy D Johnson; Daniel A Hamstra; Pia C Sundgren; Larry Junck; Charles R Meyer; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Theodore Lawrence; Brian D Ross Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Esin Ozturk-Isik; Andrea Pirzkall; Kathleen R Lamborn; Soonmee Cha; Susan M Chang; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Esin Ozturk-Isik; Albert P Chen; Jason C Crane; Wei Bian; Duan Xu; Eric T Han; Susan M Chang; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-09-19 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Alan T Villavicencio; Sigita Burneikiene; Pantaleo Romanelli; Laura Fariselli; Lee McNeely; John D Lipani; Steven D Chang; E Lee Nelson; Melinda McIntyre; Giovanni Broggi; John R Adler Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2009-07-25 Impact factor: 3.042