BACKGROUND: Early dementia diagnosis is aided by the use of brief screening tests; scores can be biased by patient and informant characteristics such as age, gender and education. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the General Practitioner's Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG), a brief screening tool for detecting cognitive impairment comprising a patient cognitive test and questions to an informant, is biased by patient and informant characteristics. DESIGN: Sixty-seven general practitioners recruited consecutive patients (with informants). Patients were subsequently assessed by a research psychologist, and DSM-IV diagnoses assigned following a case-conference. SETTING: Primary Care. SUBJECTS: Two hundred and eighty three home-dwelling individuals, 11.3% of whom were aged 50-74 years with suspected memory problems and the rest aged 75 or more. METHODS: The GPCOG, Cambridge Mental Disorder of the Elderly Examination cognitive scale (CAMCOG), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12) were administered and demographic data were collected and consensus DSM-IV diagnoses of dementia made. Relationships between patient and informant characteristics and the GPCOG measure were examined using Pearson correlations and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: There were correlations in GPCOG-patient scores with age, education and depression scores but on regression analysis only age was associated with the GPCOG-patient section. The GPCOG-informant section was free of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The GPCOG has advantages for use in primary care and is free of many biases common in other scales.
BACKGROUND: Early dementia diagnosis is aided by the use of brief screening tests; scores can be biased by patient and informant characteristics such as age, gender and education. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the General Practitioner's Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG), a brief screening tool for detecting cognitive impairment comprising a patient cognitive test and questions to an informant, is biased by patient and informant characteristics. DESIGN: Sixty-seven general practitioners recruited consecutive patients (with informants). Patients were subsequently assessed by a research psychologist, and DSM-IV diagnoses assigned following a case-conference. SETTING: Primary Care. SUBJECTS: Two hundred and eighty three home-dwelling individuals, 11.3% of whom were aged 50-74 years with suspected memory problems and the rest aged 75 or more. METHODS: The GPCOG, Cambridge Mental Disorder of the Elderly Examination cognitive scale (CAMCOG), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12) were administered and demographic data were collected and consensus DSM-IV diagnoses of dementia made. Relationships between patient and informant characteristics and the GPCOG measure were examined using Pearson correlations and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: There were correlations in GPCOG-patient scores with age, education and depression scores but on regression analysis only age was associated with the GPCOG-patient section. The GPCOG-informant section was free of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The GPCOG has advantages for use in primary care and is free of many biases common in other scales.
Authors: Diana Matallana; Cecilia de Santacruz; Carlos Cano; Pablo Reyes; Rafael Samper-Ternent; Kyriakos S Markides; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Carlos A Reyes-Ortiz Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Breda Cullen; Brian O'Neill; Jonathan J Evans; Robert F Coen; Brian A Lawlor Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-12-18 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Marie Flannery; Karen F Stein; David W Dougherty; Supriya Mohile; Joseph Guido; Nancy Wells Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Constance D Pond; Henry Brodaty; Nigel P Stocks; Jane Gunn; John Marley; Peter Disler; Parker Magin; Nerida Paterson; Graeme Horton; Susan Goode; Bronwen Paine; Karen E Mate Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 2.497