Literature DB >> 1535202

Propofol versus thiamylal-enflurane anesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy.

G I Randel1, L Levy, S P Kothary, S K Pandit.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether propofol anesthesia differs from thiamylal-enflurane anesthesia in induction characteristics, intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative side effects, and postoperative psychomotor function recovery.
DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, two-group study.
SETTING: A large university hospital with gynecologic outpatient operations performed in an integrated operating room suite. PATIENTS: Sixty adult women (ASA physical status I or II) undergoing an outpatient gynecologic laparoscopic operation with an anesthesia time of approximately 60 minutes.
INTERVENTIONS: No pharmacologic premedication. Pretreatment with intravenous droperidol 0.6 mg and sufentanil 0.2 micrograms/kg before induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with either thiamylal 4 mg/kg (Group 1) or propofol 2.5 mg/kg (Group 2). Anesthesia was maintained with either nitrous oxide (N2O) and enflurane, 2-0.5% inspired concentrations; (Group 1) or with a continuous infusion of propofol 200-100 micrograms/kg/min and N2O (Group 2).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In psychomotor function tests (Trieger dot test and p-deletion test) administered preoperatively and postoperatively, no difference was found between the groups. No difference was found in induction time, although significantly more patients reported pain after the propofol injection, or in intraoperative hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure and heart rate). Immediate recovery time (emergence from anesthesia) and intermediate recovery time (ambulation, oral intake, and discharge time) were significantly shorter after propofol anesthesia. Fewer postoperative side effects, such as nausea and vomiting, were reported after propofol anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: Induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol were comparable to those with thiamylal-enflurane, except patients experienced more pain on injection after propofol. Both immediate and intermediate recovery were more rapid after propofol anesthesia compared with enflurane-based anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1535202     DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(92)90062-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  7 in total

1.  Is Day Care Tonsillectomy a Safe Procedure?

Authors:  Sapna Ramkrishna Parab; Mubarak M Khan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-02-02

Review 2.  Propofol. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in day case surgery.

Authors:  B Fulton; K L Goa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Systematic review of same-day laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery.

Authors:  Harun Thomas; Sanjay Agrawal
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Recovery characteristics following anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol in adults undergoing out-patient surgery.

Authors:  C Wandel; S Neff; H Böhrer; A Browne; J Motsch; E Martin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Prospective study of routine day-case laparoscopic modified Lind partial fundoplication.

Authors:  S Agrawal; I Shapey; A Peacock; A Ali; P Super
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Comparison of recovery profile for propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia in cases of open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shiv Kumar Singh; Amit Kumar; Reena Mahajan; Surabhi Katyal; Sfurti Mann
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 Sep-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.