Literature DB >> 15351986

Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples.

Christine Pirker1, Maria Raidl, Elisabeth Steiner, Leonilla Elbling, Klaus Holzmann, Sabine Spiegl-Kreinecker, Michaela Aubele, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp, Christine Marosi, Michael Micksche, Walter Berger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a powerful method to investigate chromosomal imbalances in tumor cells. However, DNA quantity and quality can be limiting factors for successful CGH analysis. The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR (DOP-PCR) and a recently developed linker-adapter-mediated PCR (LA-PCR) for whole genome amplification for use in CGH, especially for difficult source material.
METHODS: We comparatively analyzed DNA of variable quality derived from different cell/tissue types. Additionally, dilution experiments down to the DNA content of a single cell were performed. FISH and/or classical cytogenetic analyses were used as controls.
RESULTS: In the case of high quality DNA samples, both methods were equally suitable for CGH. When analyzing very small amounts of these DNA samples (equivalent to one or a few human diploid cells), DOP-PCR-CGH, but not LA-PCR-CGH, frequently produced false-positive signals (e.g., gains in 1p and 16p, and losses in chromosome 4q). In case of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, success rates by LA-PCR-CGH were significantly higher as compared to DOP-PCR-CGH. DNA of minor quality frequently could be analyzed correctly by LA-PCR-CGH, but was prone to give false-positive and/or false-negative results by DOP-PCR-CGH.
CONCLUSIONS: LA-PCR is superior to DOP-PCR for amplification of DNA for CGH analysis, especially in the case of very limited or partly degraded source material. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351986     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  4 in total

1.  A robust method to analyze copy number alterations of less than 100 kb in single cells using oligonucleotide array CGH.

Authors:  Birte Möhlendick; Christoph Bartenhagen; Bianca Behrens; Ellen Honisch; Katharina Raba; Wolfram T Knoefel; Nikolas H Stoecklein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Impact of terminal dimethylation on the resistance profile of α-N-heterocyclic thiosemicarbazones.

Authors:  Petra Heffeter; Christine Pirker; Christian R Kowol; Gerrit Herrman; Rita Dornetshuber; Walter Miklos; Ute Jungwirth; Gunda Koellensperger; Bernhard K Keppler; Walter Berger
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  Dynamics of chemosensitivity and chromosomal instability in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  S Spiegl-Kreinecker; C Pirker; C Marosi; J Buchroithner; J Pichler; R Silye; J Fischer; M Micksche; W Berger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Phi29 polymerase based random amplification of viral RNA as an alternative to random RT-PCR.

Authors:  Nicolas Berthet; Anita K Reinhardt; India Leclercq; Sven van Ooyen; Christophe Batéjat; Philip Dickinson; Rayna Stamboliyska; Iain G Old; Katherine A Kong; Laurent Dacheux; Hervé Bourhy; Giulia C Kennedy; Christian Korfhage; Stewart T Cole; Jean-Claude Manuguerra
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 2.946

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.