BACKGROUND: Antisocial behavior and substance dependence disorders exact a heavy financial and human cost on society. A better understanding of the mechanisms of familial transmission for these "externalizing" disorders is necessary to better understand their etiology and to help develop intervention strategies. OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which the family transmission of externalizing disorders is due to a general vs a disorder-specific vulnerability and, owing to the genetically informative nature of our data, to estimate the heritable vs environmental nature of these transmission effects. DESIGN: We used structural equation modeling to simultaneously estimate the general and specific transmission effects of 4 externalizing disorders: conduct disorder, adult antisocial behavior, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the community and were interviewed in a university laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 542 families participating in the Minnesota Twin Family Study. All families included 17-year-old twins and their biological mother and father. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom counts of conduct disorder, the adult criteria for antisocial personality disorder, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence. RESULTS: Transmission of a general vulnerability to all the externalizing disorders accounted for most familial resemblance. This general vulnerability was highly heritable (h2 = 0.80). Disorder-specific vulnerabilities were also detected for conduct disorder, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism underlying the familial transmission of externalizing disorders is primarily a highly heritable general vulnerability. This general vulnerability or common risk factor should be the focus of research regarding the etiology and treatment of externalizing disorders.
BACKGROUND: Antisocial behavior and substance dependence disorders exact a heavy financial and human cost on society. A better understanding of the mechanisms of familial transmission for these "externalizing" disorders is necessary to better understand their etiology and to help develop intervention strategies. OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which the family transmission of externalizing disorders is due to a general vs a disorder-specific vulnerability and, owing to the genetically informative nature of our data, to estimate the heritable vs environmental nature of these transmission effects. DESIGN: We used structural equation modeling to simultaneously estimate the general and specific transmission effects of 4 externalizing disorders: conduct disorder, adult antisocial behavior, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence. SETTING:Participants were recruited from the community and were interviewed in a university laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 542 families participating in the Minnesota Twin Family Study. All families included 17-year-old twins and their biological mother and father. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom counts of conduct disorder, the adult criteria for antisocial personality disorder, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence. RESULTS: Transmission of a general vulnerability to all the externalizing disorders accounted for most familial resemblance. This general vulnerability was highly heritable (h2 = 0.80). Disorder-specific vulnerabilities were also detected for conduct disorder, alcohol dependence, and drug dependence. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism underlying the familial transmission of externalizing disorders is primarily a highly heritable general vulnerability. This general vulnerability or common risk factor should be the focus of research regarding the etiology and treatment of externalizing disorders.
Authors: Jennifer A Bailey; Karl G Hill; Meredith C Meacham; Susan E Young; J David Hawkins Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Katie A McLaughlin; Anne M Gadermann; Irving Hwang; Nancy A Sampson; Ali Al-Hamzawi; Laura Helena Andrade; Matthias C Angermeyer; Corina Benjet; Evelyn J Bromet; Ronny Bruffaerts; José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Hristo Ruskov Hinkov; Itsuko Horiguchi; Chiyi Hu; Aimee Nasser Karam; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Sing Lee; Samuel D Murphy; S Haque Nizamie; José Posada-Villa; David R Williams; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Scott I Vrieze; Shuang Feng; Michael B Miller; Brian M Hicks; Nathan Pankratz; Gonçalo R Abecasis; William G Iacono; Matt McGue Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 13.382