Literature DB >> 15351439

Heterogeneous response of cerebral blood flow to hypotension demonstrated by laser speckle imaging flowmetry in rats.

Alexander Kharlamov1, Benjamin R Brown, Kirk A Easley, Stephen C Jones.   

Abstract

The response of cerebral blood flow (CBF) to mild hypotension shows great variability. CBF changes in different cortical regions at a mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) of 70 mmHg (near the lower limit of CBF-pressure autoregulation) were analyzed using laser speckle imaging flowmetry (LSIF). We hypothesize that variations in CBF autoregulation might be due to differences between regions within the cortex of each animal, regional heterogeneity, as opposed to differences between animals. Different responses of local CBF to hypotension in each rat were demonstrated as %CBF(70), the ratio of CBF at a MABP of 70 mmHg to CBF at a MABP of 100 mmHg. Regional heterogeneity ranged from 12 to 51%, expressed as the coefficient of variation of %CBF(70). At the same time LSIF revealed distinctly different patterns of CBF-pressure autoregulation between animals. Between-animal heterogeneity represents a continuous distribution, spread between animals with predominantly decreased CBF (%CBF(70) < 85%, rat #3) and animals with a high proportion of increased flow responses (%CBF(70) > 115%, rat #2). There are approximately equal contributions to the heterogeneity of %CBF(70) from within-animal (57 +/- 5%, percent variance +/- standard error) and between-animal (43 +/- 26%) variations. Within-animal variations could be due to heterogeneity of vascular anatomy, while the diversity of vascular control mechanisms might contribute to between-animal variations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351439     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.06.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  7 in total

1.  Cerebral Blood Flow Response During Bolus Normal Saline Infusion After Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Michael T Mullen; Ashwin B Parthasarathy; Ali Zandieh; Wesley B Baker; Rickson C Mesquita; Caitlin Loomis; Jose Torres; Wensheng Guo; Christopher G Favilla; Steven R Messé; Arjun G Yodh; John A Detre; Scott E Kasner
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Variations of brain endothelial nitric oxide synthase concentration in rat and mouse cortex.

Authors:  R Kenneth Czambel; Alexander Kharlamov; Stephen C Jones
Journal:  Nitric Oxide       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.427

3.  Simultaneous imaging of cerebral partial pressure of oxygen and blood flow during functional activation and cortical spreading depression.

Authors:  Sava Sakadzić; Shuai Yuan; Ergin Dilekoz; Svetlana Ruvinskaya; Sergei A Vinogradov; Cenk Ayata; David A Boas
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Simultaneous multispectral reflectance imaging and laser speckle flowmetry of cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism in focal cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Phill B Jones; Hwa Kyoung Shin; David A Boas; Bradley T Hyman; Michael A Moskowitz; Cenk Ayata; Andrew K Dunn
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Random process estimator for laser speckle imaging of cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  Peng Miao; Nan Li; Nitish V Thakor; Shanbao Tong
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Closed cranial window rodent model for investigating hemodynamic response to elevated intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Matt T Oberdier; James F Antaki; Alexander Kharlamov; Stephen C Jones
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2021-11-19

7.  Laser Speckle Imaging of Rat Pial Microvasculature during Hypoperfusion-Reperfusion Damage.

Authors:  Teresa Mastantuono; Noemy Starita; Laura Battiloro; Martina Di Maro; Martina Chiurazzi; Gilda Nasti; Espedita Muscariello; Mario Cesarelli; Luigi Iuppariello; Gianni D'Addio; Alexander Gorbach; Antonio Colantuoni; Dominga Lapi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.505

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.