Literature DB >> 15351332

Elective cesarean birth: issues and ethics of an informed decision.

Barbara L McFarlin1.   

Abstract

Is elective cesarean birth an issue of a woman's autonomy to choose her mode of birth or fear of labor by both the patient and the providers? Are women consenting to this procedure truly informed about the short-term and long-term risks associated with cesarean birth versus vaginal birth? This article examines the issues associated with elective cesarean birth and the factors that have led to recent consideration of this option. It is essential that we evaluate how risks, benefits, and liability issues impact the recommendations for the mode of birth. The ethics of making an informed choice as well as ethical professional responsibilities are explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351332     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ethical and practical consideration of women choosing cesarean section deliveries without "medical indication" in developing countries.

Authors:  Adamson S Muula
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Birthing ethics: what mothers, families, childbirth educators, nurses, and physicians should know about the ethics of childbirth.

Authors:  Jennifer M Torres; Raymond G De Vries
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Factors that influence the practice of elective induction of labor: what does the evidence tell us?

Authors:  Jennifer Moore; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.638

4.  Solving the puzzle of prematurity.

Authors:  Barbara Louise McFarlin
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.220

5.  Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J C Rivo; M Amyx; V Pingray; R A Casale; A E Fiorillo; H B Krupitzki; J D Malamud; M Mendilaharzu; M L Medina; A B Del Pino; L Ribola; J A Schvartzman; G M Tartalo; M Trasmonte; S Varela; F Althabe; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Vaginal Delivery vs. Cesarean Section: A Focused Ethnographic Study of Women's Perceptions in The North of Iran.

Authors:  Maryam Zakerihamidi; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari; Effat Merghati Khoei
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2015-01

Review 7.  The effect of an elective cesarean section on maternal request on peripartum anxiety and depression in women with childbirth fear: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renske M Olieman; Femke Siemonsma; Margaux A Bartens; Susan Garthus-Niegel; Fedde Scheele; Adriaan Honig
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  The Ontario Mother and Infant Study (TOMIS) III: a multi-site cohort study of the impact of delivery method on health, service use, and costs of care in the first postpartum year.

Authors:  Wendy Sword; Susan Watt; Paul Krueger; Lehana Thabane; Christine Kurtz Landy; Dan Farine; Marilyn Swinton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  Najmeh Maharlouei; Abbas Rezaianzadeh; Elham Hesami; Fariba Moradi; Ezat Mazloomi; Hassan Joulaei; Mohammad Khodayari; Kamran B Lankarani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Does knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy predict birth preparedness? A critique of the evidence from women admitted with pregnancy complications.

Authors:  Scovia N Mbalinda; Annettee Nakimuli; Othman Kakaire; Michael O Osinde; Nelson Kakande; Dan K Kaye
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2014-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.