A Figueiras1, E Lado, S Fernández, X Hervada. 1. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Publica, Facultad de Medicina, San Francisco, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruna 15705, Spain. mradolfo@usc.es
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify practitioners' demographic and professional characteristics associated with reporting of mandatory-reporting diseases (MRDs), and to identify attitudes associated with MRD reporting. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Regional Health Service of Galicia (North-western Spain). SUBJECTS: Random sample of 600 physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A postal questionnaire was used to measure the physicians' beliefs, knowledge and attitudes regarding MRDs. Associations between the independent variables and outcomes (notification or non-notification of MRDs every week during 1998) were modelled using the Andersen-Gill proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The response rate was 60.1%. The following beliefs, knowledge and attitudes were statistically associated with a smaller probability of reporting any given MRD: (1) I would only notify an MRD after confirming diagnosis; (2) the MRD reporting system interferes with my daily clinical practice; (3) besides the legal requirements, I would have to report MRDs as a medical professional; and (4) only the reporting of relevant or severe MRDs is necessary. Under-reporting was not associated with specialization (general or paediatric) or the type of contract (fixed or temporary), but was associated with gender. CONCLUSIONS: Some physicians' beliefs, knowledge and attitudes regarding MRDs are associated with under-reporting. This suggests that modification of certain attitudes and knowledge in physicians could greatly reduce the under-reporting of MRDs.
OBJECTIVES: To identify practitioners' demographic and professional characteristics associated with reporting of mandatory-reporting diseases (MRDs), and to identify attitudes associated with MRD reporting. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Regional Health Service of Galicia (North-western Spain). SUBJECTS: Random sample of 600 physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A postal questionnaire was used to measure the physicians' beliefs, knowledge and attitudes regarding MRDs. Associations between the independent variables and outcomes (notification or non-notification of MRDs every week during 1998) were modelled using the Andersen-Gill proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The response rate was 60.1%. The following beliefs, knowledge and attitudes were statistically associated with a smaller probability of reporting any given MRD: (1) I would only notify an MRD after confirming diagnosis; (2) the MRD reporting system interferes with my daily clinical practice; (3) besides the legal requirements, I would have to report MRDs as a medical professional; and (4) only the reporting of relevant or severe MRDs is necessary. Under-reporting was not associated with specialization (general or paediatric) or the type of contract (fixed or temporary), but was associated with gender. CONCLUSIONS: Some physicians' beliefs, knowledge and attitudes regarding MRDs are associated with under-reporting. This suggests that modification of certain attitudes and knowledge in physicians could greatly reduce the under-reporting of MRDs.
Authors: Ali Janati; Mozhgan Hosseiny; Mohammad Mehdi Gouya; Ghobad Moradi; Ebrahim Ghaderi Journal: Iran J Public Health Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.429
Authors: Katalin Vraukó; Zoltán Jancsó; László Kalabay; Andrea Lukács; Gabriella Maráczi; Lajos Mester; Anna Nánási; József Rinfel; Tamás Sárosi; Ferenc Tamás; Albert Varga; József Vitrai; Imre Rurik Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 3.090