Literature DB >> 15351192

Effect of long-acting nifedipine on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with stable angina requiring treatment (ACTION trial): randomised controlled trial.

Philip A Poole-Wilson1, Jacobus Lubsen, Bridget-Anne Kirwan, Fred J van Dalen, Gilbert Wagener, Nicolas Danchin, Hanjörg Just, Keith A A Fox, Stuart J Pocock, Tim C Clayton, Michael Motro, John D Parker, Martial G Bourassa, Anthony M Dart, Per Hildebrandt, Ake Hjalmarson, Johannes A Kragten, G Peter Molhoek, Jan-Erik Otterstad, Ricardo Seabra-Gomes, Jordi Soler-Soler, Simon Weber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Calcium antagonists are widely prescribed for angina pectoris but their effect on clinical outcome is controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect of the calcium antagonist nifedipine on long-term outcome in patients with stable angina pectoris.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 3825 patients with treated stable symptomatic coronary disease to double-blind addition of nifedipine GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) 60 mg once daily and 3840 to placebo. The primary endpoint was the combination of death, acute myocardial infarction, refractory angina, new overt heart failure, debilitating stroke, and peripheral revascularisation. Mean follow-up was 4.9 years (SD 1.1). Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: 310 patients allocated nifedipine died (1.64 per 100 patient-years) compared with 291 people allocated placebo (1.53 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 1.07 [95% CI 0.91-1.25], p=0.41). Primary endpoint rates were 4.60 per 100 patient-years for nifedipine and 4.75 per 100 patient-years for placebo (0.97 [0.88-1.07], p=0.54). With nifedipine, rate of death and any cardiovascular event or procedure was 9.32 per 100 patient-years versus 10.50 per 100 patient-years for placebo (0.89 [0.83-0.95], p=0.0012). The difference was mainly attributable to a reduction in the need for coronary angiography and interventions in patients assigned nifedipine, despite an increase in peripheral revascularisation. Nifedipine had no effect on the rate of myocardial infarction.
INTERPRETATION: Addition of nifedipine GITS to conventional treatment of angina pectoris has no effect on major cardiovascular event-free survival. Nifedipine GITS is safe and reduces the need for coronary angiography and interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351192     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16980-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  97 in total

Review 1.  Heart rate: a forgotten link in coronary artery disease?

Authors:  Kim M Fox; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Is blood pressure reduction a valid surrogate endpoint for stroke prevention? An analysis incorporating a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, a by-trial weighted errors-in-variables regression, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) and the Biomarker-Surrogacy (BioSurrogate) Evaluation Schema (BSES).

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere; Kent R Johnson; Michal Schiff; David Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Effects of anti-hypertensive treatment on major cardiovascular events in populations within prehypertensive levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongqiu Hong; Tao Wu; Shuxian Zhou; Boshui Huang; Jingfeng Wang; Dongmei Jin; Dengfeng Geng
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Prevalence, incidence, primary care burden and medical treatment of angina in Scotland: age, sex and socioeconomic disparities: a population-based study.

Authors:  N F Murphy; C R Simpson; K MacIntyre; F A McAlister; J Chalmers; J J V McMurray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Clinical trials report. Good news and bad news: now the bad news.

Authors:  Norman M Kaplan
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  The role of intravascular ultrasound in the determination of progression and regression of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hideaki Kaneda; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Hiroshi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Relief of Ischemia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Francesco Moroni; Zachary Gertz; Lorenzo Azzalini
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients.

Authors:  N Sekhri; G S Feder; C Junghans; H Hemingway; A D Timmis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Hypertension in pregnancy: a review of therapeutic options.

Authors:  D Kernaghan; A C Duncan; G A McKay
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2012-02-17

10.  Comparison of effect between nitrates and calcium channel antagonist on vascular function in patients with normal or mildly diseased coronary arteries.

Authors:  Yuichi Ninomiya; Shuichi Hamasaki; Keishi Saihara; Sanemasa Ishida; Tetsuro Kataoka; Masakazu Ogawa; Koji Orihara; Naoya Oketani; Tsuyoshi Fukudome; Hideki Okui; Tomoko Ichiki; Takuro Shinsato; Takuro Kubozono; Etsuko Mizoguchi; Hitoshi Ichiki; Chuwa Tei
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.