Literature DB >> 15351098

Hormones and mammographic breast density.

Ruth Warren1.   

Abstract

Mammographic density reveals information about the hormonal environment along with the heritability in which breast cancer develops. This is made possible by the widespread use of population screening by mammography. Increasingly this is an important observation not just for population studies, which reveal disease determinants, but also for the individual. Density reveals the effect of the intrinsic hormonal environment and its background genetics, and also the effect of pharmaceuticals--agents used for disease control and prevention and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) used for well-being around the menopause. Increasingly this focus on the individual will need methods of measurement of density that can be monitored with greater accuracy than the widely used BI-RADS 4 categories. For this purpose studies are under way to measure volume of dense tissue as a continuous variable. In due course, measurement of density will be used as a biomarker of risk, employed in risk models and to monitor interventions. Before this can happen more knowledge will be needed of the change occurring naturally through the menopause and the differences between individuals. This will need specific study backed up with detailed information about the patient on large numbers of women and their mammograms. Currently the widespread use of HRT has increased the prevalence of the dense patterns and potentially may adversely affect the effectiveness of mammographic screening programmes. There is a large literature recording this from which we see that combined continuous preparations of oestrogen progestin are more likely to cause increased density than oestrogen alone or tibolone. Breast density, measured more accurately, has the potential to be an important adjunct to risk estimation and to monitor interventions for breast cancer prevention with pharmaceuticals (such as SERMS) and by change in lifestyle behaviours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351098     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical opinion: the biologic and pharmacologic principles for age-adjusted long-term estrogen therapy.

Authors:  Morris Notelovitz
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-03-28

2.  Breast tissue density change after oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carrier patients using visual and volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; Ariane Dunant; Suzette Delaloge; Delphine Wehrer; Tania Moussa; Olivier Caron; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Association Between Lifestyle Changes, Mammographic Breast Density, and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sara P Lester; Aparna S Kaur; Suneela Vegunta
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.837

4.  Relationship between breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in the Fernald Community Cohort.

Authors:  L Yaghjyan; M C Mahoney; P Succop; R Wones; J Buckholz; S M Pinney
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Inger T Gram; Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Gertraud Maskarinec; Nils Bjurstam; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Factors Associated with Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Emel Kiyak Caglayan; Kasim Caglayan; Ismet Alkis; Ergin Arslan; Aylin Okur; Oktay Banli; Yaprak Engin-Ustün
Journal:  J Menopausal Med       Date:  2015-08-28

7.  Breast Density and Breast Cancer Incidence in the Lebanese Population: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Christine Salem; David Atallah; Joelle Safi; Georges Chahine; Antoine Haddad; Nadine El Kassis; Laura-Maria Maalouly; Malak Moubarak; Mary Dib; Michel Ghossain
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Carla H van Gils; Thomas A Sellers; Karthik Ghosh; Sandhya Pruthi; Kathleen R Brandt; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Role of androgens, progestins and tibolone in the treatment of menopausal symptoms: a review of the clinical evidence.

Authors:  Maria Garefalakis; Martha Hickey
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M Jeffreys; R Warren; R Highnam; G Davey Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.