Literature DB >> 15350857

Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage.

Ernst H W Koster1, Geert Crombez, Bruno Verschuere, Jan De Houwer.   

Abstract

The dot probe task [J Abnorm Psychol 95 (1986) 15] is an often-used paradigm to investigate selective attention to threat. A facilitated response to probes that appear at the same location of threat information in comparison with responses to probes at the opposite location of threat information is interpreted as vigilance for threat. We argue that the findings in the dot probe paradigm are ambiguous evidence for the vigilance to threat hypothesis. Results can also be interpreted as a difficulty to disengage from threat. In this study, 44 undergraduates performed a pictorial version of the probe detection task. Taking into account the reaction times on neutral trials, we found no evidence for a facilitated detection of threatening information. It was found that the dot probe effects are at least partially due to disengagement effects. The implications of these results for the understanding of attentional bias in normal and anxious individuals are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15350857     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  133 in total

1.  Transient and sustained neural responses to death-related linguistic cues.

Authors:  Zhenhao Shi; Shihui Han
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  What does the dot-probe task measure? A reverse correlation analysis of electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Nina N Thigpen; L Forest Gruss; Steven Garcia; David R Herring; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Sustained and transient modulation of performance induced by emotional picture viewing.

Authors:  Mirtes Garcia Pereira; Eliane Volchan; Gabriela Guerra Leal de Souza; Leticia Oliveira; Rafaela Ramos Campagnoli; Walter Machado Pinheiro; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-11

4.  Mental rubbernecking to negative information depends on task context.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; Carol L Raye; Joseph T McGuire; Charles A Sanislow
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

5.  Children's cognitive performance and selective attention following recent community violence.

Authors:  Dana Charles McCoy; C Cybele Raver; Patrick Sharkey
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2015-02-06

6.  Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers.

Authors:  Tim Schoenmakers; Reinout W Wiers; Matt Field
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Association between attention bias to threat and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Rany Abend; Leone de Voogd; Elske Salemink; Reinout W Wiers; Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Amanda Fitzgerald; Lauren K White; Giovanni A Salum; Jie He; Wendy K Silverman; Jeremy W Pettit; Daniel S Pine; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 6.505

Review 8.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

9.  Intranasal oxytocin selectively attenuates rhesus monkeys' attention to negative facial expressions.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Meera Modi; Erin Siebert; Larry J Young
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.905

10.  Emotional face processing and emotion regulation in children: an ERP study.

Authors:  Tracy A Dennis; Melville M Malone; Chao-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.