Literature DB >> 15350354

Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach.

Dennis S Chi1, Corinna C Franklin, Douglas A Levine, Faina Akselrod, Paul Sabbatini, William R Jarnagin, Ronald DeMatteo, Elizabeth A Poynor, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Richard R Barakat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the incorporation of extensive upper abdominal debulking procedures on the rates of optimal primary cytoreduction and complications in stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinomas.
METHODS: Two groups of patients were identified for comparison. Group 1, the control group, consisted of 70 consecutive patients who underwent "standard" primary cytoreductive surgery before May 2000. Group 2, the study group, was composed of 70 consecutive patients who underwent surgery after January 2001, during which time, a more comprehensive debulking of upper abdominal disease was used, including diaphragm stripping/resection, splenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, liver resection, resection of porta hepatis tumor, and cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: The median age of the entire cohort was 60 years (range, 36-88 years). The majority had stage IIIC disease (86%) and serous histology (76%). Optimal cytoreduction (residual disease </=1 cm) rates were 50% for group 1 and 76% for group 2 (P < 0.01). Patients in group 2 were more likely to have undergone extensive procedure(s) (27% versus 3%; P < 0.001). Operative time and estimated blood loss were greater in group 2 than group 1 (264 versus 174 min, 880 versus 460 cc, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). Complication rates and length of hospitalization were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The use of extensive upper abdominal surgical procedures significantly increased the rate of optimal primary cytoreduction. Although operative time and estimated blood loss were increased, the rate of major complications and length of hospitalization remained the same.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15350354     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  56 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the number of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Dennis S Chi; Kara C Long Roche; Edward J Tanner; John Denesopolis; Richard R Barakat; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Surgical therapy for testicular cancer metastatic to the liver.

Authors:  Mary Maluccio; Lawrence H Einhorn; Robert J Goulet
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  En bloc pelvic resection of ovarian cancer with rectosigmoid colectomy: a literature review.

Authors:  Myeong-Seon Kim; Joseph J Noh; Yoo-Young Lee
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

4.  Predictive value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index on perioperative complications and survival in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Mario M Leitao; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J Gardner; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Elizabeth L Jewell; Carol L Brown; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mary E Charlson; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Risk stratification and outcomes of women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sonali Patankar; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  A preoperative personalized risk assessment calculator for elderly ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Sarah Rutstein; William C Miller; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Operative management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mario M Leitao; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Assessment of outcomes and morbidity following diaphragmatic peritonectomy for women with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy; Ralitsa T Loewen; Giovanni Aletti; Simone S Feitoza; William Cliby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Feasibility and safety of extensive upper abdominal surgery in elderly patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Myong Cheol Lim; Sokbom Kang; Yong Jung Song; Sae Hyun Park; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Incidental events of diaphragmatic surgery in 82 patients with advanced ovarian, primary peritoneal and fallopian tubal cancer.

Authors:  Fumitoshi Terauchi; Aikou Okamoto; Yumiko Wada; Ei Hasegawa; Toru Sasaki; Osamu Akutagawa; Yasukazu Sagawa; Hirotaka Nishi; Keiichi Isaka
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.