Literature DB >> 15349005

Cost and effectiveness of venlafaxine extended-release and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the acute phase of outpatient treatment for major depressive disorder.

Madhukar H Trivedi1, George J Wan, Rajiv Mallick, Jieling Chen, Roman Casciano, Erika C Geissler, Jessica M Panish.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to estimate the cost and effectiveness of venlafaxine extended-release (VXR) compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the outpatient treatment of major depressive disorder.
METHODS: Pooled data from 8, 8-week, randomized, double-blind studies comparing treatment of major depressive disorder with venlafaxine/venlafaxine XR (n = 851), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine; n = 748), or placebo (4 studies; n = 446) were retrospectively analyzed to determine the economic implications of symptom remission from the perspective of a US third party payer and that of an employer. A decision modeling approach was used to determine cost and effectiveness ratios.
RESULTS: Patients on VXR were associated with 22.8 depression-free days versus 18.6 depression-free days with the studied selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, based on the decision model. Productive and quality-adjusted days were also expected to increase for VXR patients (22.06 vs. 19.34 and 4.56 to 9.36 vs. 3.72 to 7.63), as was the percentage of patients achieving full activity (25.9% vs. 19.6%). The expected cost per patient achieving remission of symptoms was US 1303.94 dollars and US 1514.96 dollars, and the cost per depression-free days was US 25.66 dollars and US 28.25 dollars, for the VXR and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with VXR is not only expected to increase the rate of remission of symptoms but is also associated with achievement of full activity, higher number of depression-free days, productive days, and quality-adjusted days. VXR is a cost-effective treatment option for major depressive disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15349005     DOI: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000138769.61600.e4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  10 in total

1.  A proposed model for economic evaluations of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Hossein Haji Ali Afzali; Jonathan Karnon; Jodi Gray
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-02

Review 2.  Remission from depression : a review of venlafaxine clinical and economic evidence.

Authors:  Donald Han; Edward C Y Wang
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost effectiveness of venlafaxine compared with generic fluoxetine or generic amitriptyline in major depressive disorder in the UK.

Authors:  Alan Lenox-Smith; Liz Greenstreet; Kate Burslem; Chris Knight
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  A critical review of model-based economic studies of depression: modelling techniques, model structure and data sources.

Authors:  Hossein Haji Ali Afzali; Jonathan Karnon; Jodi Gray
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Do productivity costs matter?: the impact of including productivity costs on the incremental costs of interventions targeted at depressive disorders.

Authors:  Marieke Krol; Jocé Papenburg; Marc Koopmanschap; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Advantages of using estimated depression-free days for evaluating treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Steven D Vannoy; Patricia Arean; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Desvenlafaxine in major depressive disorder: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.

Authors:  Daniel Z Lieberman; Suena H Massey
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 8.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Methodologies used in cost-effectiveness models for evaluating treatments in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sorrel E Wolowacz; Peter M Classi; Julie Birt; Evelina A Zimovetz
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2012-02-01

Review 10.  Model-Based Economic Evaluation of Treatments for Depression: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Spyros Kolovos; Judith E Bosmans; Heleen Riper; Karine Chevreul; Veerle M H Coupé; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2017-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.