Literature DB >> 1534882

The relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation: implications for laparoscopic technique.

W W Hurd1, R O Bude, J O DeLancey, M L Pearl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the location of the umbilicus relative to the aortic bifurcation and the left common iliac vein where it crosses the midline.
METHODS: Abdominal computed tomography images from 35 reproductive-age women were retrospectively reviewed to determine the location of the umbilicus. The results were correlated with body mass index using Pearson correlation coefficient and a two-tailed paired t test.
RESULTS: The location of the umbilicus, but not the aortic bifurcation, was more caudal in heavier women and negatively correlated with body mass index. In nonobese women, the mean location of the umbilicus was 0.4 cm caudal to the aortic bifurcation, and was at or cephalad to the bifurcation in eight of 15 (53%). In overweight women, the mean umbilical location was 2.4 cm caudal to the bifurcation, and in obese women, 2.9 cm caudal to the bifurcation. In the last two groups of subjects, the umbilicus was located at the level of the bifurcation in six of 20 (30%). In every case, the umbilicus was located cephalad to where the common iliac vein crossed the midline.
CONCLUSIONS: The umbilicus is often located at or cephalad to the aortic bifurcation, and consistently located cephalad to where the left common iliac vein crosses the midline. The laparoscopic approach should take these relationships into account to minimize injuries to major retroperitoneal vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1534882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

1.  Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations.

Authors:  S Ambardar; J Cabot; V Cekic; K Baxter; T D Arnell; K A Forde; A Nihalani; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The umbilicus: a reliable surface landmark for the aortic bifurcation?

Authors:  Lukas Attwell; Sarah Rosen; Bhavin Upadhyay; Peter Gogalniceanu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Left upper quadrant laparoscopic placement: effects of insertion angle and body mass index on distance to posterior peritoneum by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nichole M Giannios; Vikas Gulani; Kelsey Rohlck; Rebecca L Flyckt; Stacie J Weil; William W Hurd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bram Cornette; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S Krishnakumar; P Tambe
Journal:  J Gynecol Endosc Surg       Date:  2009-01

7.  Robotic hysterectomy strategies in the morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  Oscar D Almeida
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Complications of Laparoscopy in Connection with Entry Techniques.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alkatout
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Method for safe Verres needle entry at the umbilicus, with modification for first trocar entry to reduce the complication rate of first entry.

Authors:  Tehemton Erach Udwadia
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 10.  Surgical complications of laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Michael S Lasser; Reza Ghavamian
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.