Literature DB >> 15348804

Acutely repaired proximal anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in sheep - by augmentation improved stability and reduction of cartilage damage.

M Richter1, L Dürselen, A Ignatius, F Missler, L Claes, H Kiefer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the healing capacity of proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures following primary repair with and without a bioresorbable augmentation. The ACL was transected at the femoral origin in the right knee joint of 24 sheep. The ACL was repaired in eight sheep (group B) without, and in eight sheep (group C) with a bioresorbable augmentation. Eight sheep without repair served as a control (group A). No immobilization was performed in any group. The sheep were sacrificed 13 weeks post-operatively. Macroscopically, all repaired ACLs were healed. The augmentation device was broken in all cases, but not completely degraded. In group A, none of the transected ACLs had healed. The anterior drawer under a load of 50 N was significantly lower in group C than in group A (p<0.01). No significant difference was seen between groups B and A. The distribution and extent of chondromalacia (CM) in the operated knees depended on the type of operative treatment (p<0.01). Groups A and B showed significantly more CM in the operated knee than in the non-operated knee (each p<0.05). Proximal ACL ruptures can heal in sheep after both non-augmented and augmented ACL repair with free-functional rehabilitation. However, augmented repair leads to significantly better stability of the knee joint compared to transected controls and better limits the development of degenerative changes.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 15348804     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018597604034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  38 in total

1.  Augmented repair and early mobilization of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  H H Paessler; J Deneke; L E Dahners
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament repair with and without augmentation. A prospective 7-year study of 51 patients.

Authors:  T Jonsson; L Peterson; P Renström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-12

3.  Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a randomized study with a long-term follow-up period.

Authors:  C Andersson; M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J A Feagin; W W Curl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Instability of the knee. A long-term experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  J L Marshall; S E Olsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Acute anterior cruciate ligament injury and augmented repair. Experimental studies.

Authors:  H E Cabaud; J A Feagin; W G Rodkey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Treatment of acute isolated and combined ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  C Andersson; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Osteoarthrosis following insufficiency of the cruciate ligaments in man. A clinical study.

Authors:  K Jacobsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1977

9.  Retrospective direct comparison of three intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  P F Holmes; S L James; R L Larson; K M Singer; D C Jones
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament repairs in world class skiers.

Authors:  R W Higgins; J R Steadman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  4 in total

1.  Anterior crucial ligament rupture: self-healing through dynamic intraligamentary stabilization technique.

Authors:  Sandro Kohl; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Hendrik Kohlhof; Max Hartel; Harald Bonel; Phillip Henle; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Stefan Eggli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Histological evaluation of the healing potential of the anterior cruciate ligament by means of augmented and non-augmented repair: an in vivo animal study.

Authors:  Helmut Seitz; Wolfgang A Menth-Chiari; Susanna Lang; Thomas Nau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Healing of the goat anterior cruciate ligament after a new suture repair technique and bioscaffold treatment.

Authors:  D Tan Nguyen; Jurre Geel; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Savio L-Y Woo; C Niek van Dijk; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of augmented and nonaugmented primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: an in vivo animal study.

Authors:  Helmut Seitz; Wofgang Pichl; Veronika Matzi; Thomas Nau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.