Literature DB >> 15348461

Granule size and composition of bioactive glasses affect osteoconduction in rabbit.

N C Lindfors1, A J Aho.   

Abstract

Bioactive glass granules of three different compositions, regarding particularly Si- and Al- content (S53P4, S59.7P2.5, S52P3) and of two different granule sizes (200-250 microm and 630-800 microm) were implanted for 4 and 8 weeks in the distal part of rabbit femur. The effect of glass composition and granule size on bone formation was studied. The results were evaluated using histology, computerized histomorphometry, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and used for mathematical description of bone formation. The results showed that both the composition of the glass and the granule size of the granules, have influence on bone growth from the surrounding tissue. Glass S53P4, which from previous observations is known to be an effective bioactive glass and widely used in the Biomaterial Project of Turku, Finland, showed bone bonding and increasing bone growth between the granules. Glass S59.7P2.5 which due to its high Si-content should be inert, showed bone bonding. At 4 weeks the bone growth was significantly more abundant in bone defects filled with large granules (630-800 microm) than in defects filled with small granules (200-250 microm). Glass S52P3 with an alumina content of 3 wt %, showed good bone conduction, possibly even bone bonding for granules of 630-800 microm size. Granules of 200-250 microm with a high alumina content at the surface of the reaction layer, showed hardly any bone contact at all. This data, therefore, gives new information concerning bone bonding and osteoconduction of bioactive glasses with a high silica or alumina content.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 15348461     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022988117526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  10 in total

1.  Tissue response to bioactive glass and autogenous bone in the rabbit spine.

Authors:  N C Lindfors; A J Aho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Short-term behaviour of two similar active glasses used as granules in the repair of bone defects.

Authors:  A M Gatti; D Zaffe
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle.

Authors:  L L Hench; H A Paschall
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1973

Review 4.  Bioactive ceramics.

Authors:  L L Hench
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Experimental follow-up model for clinical frontal sinus obliteration with bioactive glass (S53P4).

Authors:  M Peltola; J Suonpää; K Aitasalo; H Määttänen; O Andersson; A Yli-Urpo; P Laippala
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2000

6.  Analysis of the in vivo reactions of a bioactive glass in soft and hard tissue.

Authors:  A M Gatti; G Valdrè; O H Andersson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics.

Authors:  M Jarcho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The interface of various glasses and glass ceramics with a bony implantation bed.

Authors:  U Gross; V Strunz
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1985-03

9.  Apatite formation on three kinds of bioactive material at an early stage in vivo: a comparative study by transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  M Neo; T Nakamura; C Ohtsuki; T Kokubo; T Yamamuro
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-08

10.  Calcium phosphate formation at the surface of bioactive glass in vitro.

Authors:  O H Andersson; I Kangasniemi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-08
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Biodegradable nanocomposite coatings accelerate bone healing: In vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Mehdi Mehdikhani-Nahrkhalaji; Mohammad Hossein Fathi; Vajihesadat Mortazavi; Sayed Behrouz Mousavi; Ali Akhavan; Abbas Haghighat; Batool Hashemi-Beni; Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Fatemeh Mashhadiabbas
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

2.  Bioactive glass in cavitary bone defects: a comparative experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  André Ferrari de França Camargo; André Mathias Baptista; Renato Natalino; Olavo Pires de Camargo
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 3.  Clinical Applications of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Bone Healing and Osteomyelitic Treatment: A Literature Review.

Authors:  N A P van Gestel; J Geurts; D J W Hulsen; B van Rietbergen; S Hofmann; J J Arts
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Treatment of Cavitary Bone Defects in Chronic Osteomyelitis: Biogactive glass S53P4 vs. Calcium Sulphate Antibiotic Beads.

Authors:  Albert Ferrando; Joan Part; Jose Baeza
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2017-10-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.