Literature DB >> 15348375

Influence of loading types on the shear strength of the dentin-resin interface bonding.

M A Sinhoreti1, S Consani, M F De Goes, L C Sobrinho, J C Knowles.   

Abstract

Small differences in the shear bond test can make critical differences in the bonding strength values. The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of the orthodontic-looped wire, stainless steel tape and chisel systems used in shear bonding tests to verify the resistance in the dentin-resin interface. Forty-eight human teeth were used and divided in three groups. The teeth were ground until a flat smooth surface was achieved, that was delimited with an adhesive tape containing a hole of 4 mm diameter. After, the dentine surface was treated with Scotchbond Multi Purpose and the composite Z-100 was applied in layers, through a stainless steel mold. The samples were stored at 37 degrees C and 100% of relative humidity for 24 h and, then, submitted to 500 thermal cycles. After, they were taken to an universal test machine (Otto Wolpert) with crosshead speed of 6 mm/min. The results were statistically analyzed using a Tukey's test (p\lt 0.05). The orthodontic-looped wire determined the highest values of shear bond (13.33 MPa), following by chisel (7.81 MPa) and stainless steel tape (4.87 MPa). The debonding values depend on a complex stress combination produced during the loading of the samples. Small variations in test methodologies give statistically different values for shear bond strength. Different shear strength methods in vitro make the comparative clinical performance of the resin filling materials difficult. Copyright 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 15348375     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013848901553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  25 in total

Review 1.  Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure - review of the literature.

Authors:  F A Rueggeberg
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Standardizing laboratory adhesion tests.

Authors:  D H Retief
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Shear bond strength of four dentinal adhesives applied in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  P N Mason; M Ferrari; M C Cagidiaco; C L Davidson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review.

Authors:  D H Pashley; H Sano; B Ciucchi; M Yoshiyama; R M Carvalho
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?

Authors:  A Versluis; D Tantbirojn; W H Douglas
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  The effect of dentin surface moisture on bond strength to dentin bonding agents.

Authors:  D G Charlton; M W Beatty
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.440

7.  Effects of 15 vs 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology.

Authors:  W W Barkmeier; S E Shaffer; A J Gwinnett
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.440

8.  Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic.

Authors:  A Della Bona; R van Noort
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Influence of different etchants and etching times on shear bond strength.

Authors:  J R Holtan; G P Nystrom; R A Phelps; T B Anderson; W S Becker
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  In vitro quality testing of dentin adhesives.

Authors:  G Oilo; E K Austrheim
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.331

View more
  6 in total

1.  Influence of fluoride varnish on shear bond strength of a universal adhesive on intact and demineralized enamel.

Authors:  Antonio José Ortiz-Ruiz; Iban Jesús Muñoz-Gómez; Ana Pérez-Pardo; Concepción Germán-Cecilia; Yolanda Martínez-Beneyto; Ascensión Vicente
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.

Authors:  Siddharam M Patil; Vikas B Kamble; Raviraj G Desai; Kashinath C Arabbi; Ved Prakash
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo.

Authors:  Jéssika Lagni Tonus; Fernanda Borguetti Manfroi; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Eduardo Correa Grigolo; Sérgio Helegda; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017-02

4.  Simplified Surface Treatments for Ceramic Cementation: Use of Universal Adhesive and Self-Etching Ceramic Primer.

Authors:  Heloísa A B Guimarães; Paula C Cardoso; Rafael A Decurcio; Lúcio J E Monteiro; Letícia N de Almeida; Wellington F Martins; Ana Paula R Magalhães
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2018-12-31

5.  Effect of different surface treatments and multimode adhesive application on the Weibull characteristics, wettability, surface topography and adhesion to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic.

Authors:  Karina Barbosa Souza; Dayanne Monielle Duarte Moura; Sarah Emille Gomes da Silva; Gabriela Monteiro de Araújo; Rafael de Almeida Spinelli Pinto; Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite; Mutlu Özcan; Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E Souza
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Pre-sintered Y-TZP sandblasting: effect on surface roughness, phase transformation, and Y-TZP/veneer bond strength.

Authors:  Carla Müller Ramos-Tonello; Bruno Freitas Trevizo; Raphaela Farias Rodrigues; Ana Paula Rodrigues Magalhães; Adilson Yoshio Furuse; Paulo Noronha Lisboa-Filho; Americo Sheitiro Tabata; Ana Flávia Sanches Borges
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.