Literature DB >> 15348335

Tensile properties of a bone cement containing non-ionic contrast media.

F Kjellson1, J S Wang, T Almén, A Mattsson, J Klaveness, K E Tanner, L Lidgren.   

Abstract

The addition of contrast media such as BaSO4 or ZrO2 to bone cement has adverse effects in joint replacements, including third body wear and particle-induced bone resorption. Ground PMMA containing particles of the non-ionic water-soluble iodine-based X-ray contrast media, iohexol (IHX) and iodixanol (IDX), has, in bone tissue culture, shown less bone resorption than commercial cements. These water-soluble non-ceramic contrast media may change the mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement. The static mechanical properties of bone cement containing either IHX or IDX have been investigated. There was no significant difference in ultimate stress between Palacos R (with 15.0 wt % of ZrO2) and plain cement with 8.0 wt % of IHX or IDX with mass median diameter (MMD) of 15.0 or 16.0 microm, while strain to failure was higher for the latter (p < 0.02). The larger particles (15.0 or 16.0 microm) gave significantly higher (p < 0.001) ultimate tensile strengths and strains to failure than smaller sizes (2.4 or 3.6 microm). Decreasing the amount of IHX from 10.0 wt % to 6.0 wt % gave a higher ultimate tensile strength (p < 0.001) and strain to failure (p < 0.02). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed the smaller contrast media particles attached to the surface of the polymer beads, which may prevent areas of the acrylate bead surface from participating in the polymerization. In conclusion, the mechanical properties of bone cement were influenced by the size and amount of contrast medium particles. By choosing the appropriate amount and size of particles of water-soluble non-ionic contrast media the mechanical properties of the new radio-opaque bone cement can be optimized, thus reaching and surpassing given regulatory standards. Copyright 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 15348335     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012867824140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  10 in total

1.  Production of TNF-alpha and bone resorbing activity by macrophages in response to different types of bone cement particles.

Authors:  E Ingham; T R Green; M H Stone; R Kowalski; N Watkins; J Fisher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Effect of porosity and environment on the mechanical behavior of acrylic bone cement modified with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene particles: part II. Fatigue crack propagation.

Authors:  M M Vila; M P Ginebra; F J Gil; J A Planell
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999

3.  A tribological study of retrieved hip prostheses.

Authors:  G H Isaac; B M Wroblewski; J R Atkinson; D Dowson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Ceramic bearing surfaces in total artificial joints: resistance to third body wear damage from bone cement particles.

Authors:  J R Cooper; D Dowson; J Fisher; B Jobbins
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr

Review 5.  Migration, particles, and fluid pressure. A discussion of causes of prosthetic loosening.

Authors:  P Aspenberg; H Van der Vis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The influence of bone and bone cement debris on counterface roughness in sliding wear tests of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on stainless steel.

Authors:  L Caravia; D Dowson; J Fisher; B Jobbins
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 7.  Visipaque--a step forward. A historical review.

Authors:  T Almen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1995

8.  Radio-opaque agents in bone cement increase bone resorption.

Authors:  A Sabokbar; Y Fujikawa; D W Murray; N A Athanasou
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-01

9.  Improvement of the mechanical properties of acrylic bone cements by substitution of the radio-opaque agent.

Authors:  M P Ginebra; C Aparicio; L Albuixech; E Fernández-Barragán; F J Gil; J A Planell; L Morejón; B Vázquez; J San Román
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms.

Authors:  L D Topoleski; P Ducheyne; J M Cuckler
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1990-02
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo biological responses to a novel radiopacifying agent for bone cement.

Authors:  J S Wang; J Diaz; A Sabokbar; N Athanasou; F Kjellson; K E Tanner; I D McCarthy; L Lidgren
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A Three-Parameter Weibull Distribution Method to Determine the Fracture Property of PMMA Bone Cement.

Authors:  Lielie Li; Hekai Cao; Junfeng Guan; Shuanghua He; Lihua Niu; Huaizhong Liu
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Effect of iodixanol particle size on the mechanical properties of a PMMA based bone cement.

Authors:  Fred Kjellson; Saba Abdulghani; K E Tanner; Ian D McCarthy; Lars Lidgren
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 4.727

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.