Literature DB >> 15348243

Effects of environment on the creep properties of a poly(ethylmethacrylate) based bone cement.

J C Arnold1, N P Venditti.   

Abstract

The effect of test environment on the creep behavior of a poly(ethylmethacrylate) bone cement was investigated. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of environment on the inherent material behavior, and so it was convenient to perform tests in tension on well-prepared samples. In addition to control tests in air, the liquid environments studied were water, Ringer's solution and Intralipid. Creep tests were performed in each of these environments with a range of aging times, test temperatures and applied stresses. In order to compare the effects of the environments, the creep curves were fitted to a generalized form, from which a creep rate was determined. The ratio of these creep rates between different environments at each testing condition was then used as a basis for a comparison of the detailed effects of environment. It was found that in all cases the water-based environments (water and Ringer's) had similar effects and gave the largest creep rates. Intralipid was then intermediate and air gave the lowest creep rates. These effects are mainly due to plasticization by water, although with Intralipid, some increased monomer leaching occurred, which served to reduce the creep rates. The influence of environment on the effects of aging time, temperature and stress were complex, although in general any conditions which increased water plasticization (longer aging, higher temperature and to a lesser extent, higher stress) gave an increase in creep rate. The major exception to this was at temperatures of 40 degrees C and above, where the effects of water plasticization were diminished, due to the inherent increase in molecular mobility of the material. Copyright 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 15348243     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011272626846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  7 in total

1.  Long-term (twelve to eighteen-year) follow-up of cemented total hip replacements in patients who were less than fifty years old. A follow-up note.

Authors:  D K Collis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Experimental studies of the biological response to a new bone cement: II Soft tissue reactions in the rat.

Authors:  P Revell; M Braden; B Weightman; M Freeman
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1992

3.  The bone-cement interface: histological observations on the interface of cemented arthroplasties within the immediate and late phases.

Authors:  J H Boss; I Shajrawi; S Dekel; D G Mendes
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.517

4.  Characterization of self-curing acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  R P Kusy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1978-05

5.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Residual monomer in acrylic polymers.

Authors:  K W Davy; M Braden
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Dependence of curing time, peak temperature, and mechanical properties on the composition of bone cement.

Authors:  G M Brauer; D R Steinberger; J W Stansbury
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug
  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Prediction of the long-term creep behaviour of hydroxyapatite-filled polyethylmethacrylate bone cements.

Authors:  J C Arnold; Nicholas P Venditti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Antimicrobial PMMA Bone Cement Containing Long Releasing Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes.

Authors:  Yazan Al Thaher; Raida Khalil; Sharif Abdelghany; Mutaz S Salem
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Dynamic mechanical behavior of PMMA based bone cements in wet environment.

Authors:  R De Santis; F Mollica; L Ambrosio; L Nicolais; D Ronca
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Creep and fatigue behavior of a novel 2-component paste-like formulation of acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  Ulrike Köster; Raimund Jaeger; Mareike Bardts; Christian Wahnes; Hubert Büchner; Klaus-Dieter Kühn; Sebastian Vogt
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Ageing and moisture uptake in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cements.

Authors:  Wayne Nishio Ayre; Stephen P Denyer; Samuel L Evans
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-12-19

6.  Use of Deep Learning Networks and Statistical Modeling to Predict Changes in Mechanical Parameters of Contaminated Bone Cements.

Authors:  Anna Machrowska; Jakub Szabelski; Robert Karpiński; Przemysław Krakowski; Józef Jonak; Kamil Jonak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Stem subsidence of polished and rough double-taper stems: in vitro mechanical effects on the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Ayumi Kaneuji; Kengo Yamada; Kenichi Hirosaki; Masahiro Takano; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Cement-implant interface contamination: possible reason of inferior clinical outcomes for rough surface cemented stems.

Authors:  Tian Wang; Matthew H Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Alan Crosky; William R Walsh
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-06-28

9.  Effect of Physiological Fluids Contamination on Selected Mechanical Properties of Acrylate Bone Cement.

Authors:  Robert Karpiński; Jakub Szabelski; Jacek Maksymiuk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Seasoning Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cements with Incorrect Mix Ratio.

Authors:  Robert Karpiński; Jakub Szabelski; Jacek Maksymiuk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.