Literature DB >> 15347974

In vitro and in vivo methods to determine the interactions of osteogenic cells with biomaterials.

R O Oreffo1, J T Triffitt.   

Abstract

To assess new biomaterials for possible use as bone graft substitutes, a number of techniques allow interactions with osteoblastic cells to be studied, with respect to effects on proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitors. In vitro models include the use of bone explant cultures, fetal rat calvarial-derived osteoblast cells, primary stromal populations, transformed and non-transformed cell lines and immortalized osteoblast cell lines. However, these assessments are limited by the extent of osteogenic differentiation and bone formation that can be observed in vitro, species differences and phenotypic drift of cells cultured in vitro. The use of in vivo experimental systems such as the segmental/calvarial bone defect model, the subcutaneous implant model and the diffusion chamber implantation model circumvent some of these issues and, in the appropriate model, provide data on efficacy, biocompatibility and osteointegration of a biomaterial. The combination of in vitro and in vivo approaches together with the development of new cell labeling techniques, in particular the ability to genetically mark and select specific human bone cell populations provides new avenues for their potential evaluation in combination with appropriate biomaterials for clinical use. These in vitro and in vivo techniques are reviewed and those recently developed for assessment of human osteogenic cells should be applicable to many other cell systems where knowledge of specific human tissue or cell interactions with biomaterials is required. Copyright 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 15347974     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008931607002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  36 in total

1.  Monoclonal antibodies reactive with human osteogenic cell surface antigens.

Authors:  S P Bruder; M C Horowitz; J D Mosca; S E Haynesworth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Osteochondral differentiation and the emergence of stage-specific osteogenic cell-surface molecules by bone marrow cells in diffusion chambers.

Authors:  S P Bruder; D Gazit; L Passi-Even; I Bab; A I Caplan
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1990-11

3.  Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix.

Authors:  T A Owen; M Aronow; V Shalhoub; L M Barone; L Wilming; M S Tassinari; M B Kennedy; S Pockwinse; J B Lian; G S Stein
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Immortalization of human marrow stromal cells by retroviral transduction with a temperature sensitive oncogene: identification of bipotential precursor cells capable of directed differentiation to either an osteoblast or adipocyte phenotype.

Authors:  A Houghton; B O Oyajobi; G A Foster; R G Russell; B M Stringer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Heterotopic osteogenesis in porous ceramics induced by marrow cells.

Authors:  H Ohgushi; V M Goldberg; A I Caplan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  In vitro synthesis of normal bone (Type I) collagen by bones of Paget's disease patients.

Authors:  H S Cheung; F R Singer; B Mills; M E Nimni
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1980-04

7.  Modulation of osteogenesis and adipogenesis by human serum in human bone marrow cultures.

Authors:  R O Oreffo; A S Virdi; J T Triffitt
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line.

Authors:  S A Harris; R J Enger; B L Riggs; T C Spelsberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Histological and biochemical evaluation of osteogenic response in porous hydroxyapatite coated alumina ceramics.

Authors:  T Takaoka; M Okumura; H Ohgushi; K Inoue; Y Takakura; S Tamai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Induction of bone in composites of osteogenin and porous hydroxyapatite in baboons.

Authors:  U Ripamonti; S S Ma; A H Reddi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biocompatibility of adhesive complex coacervates modeled after the sandcastle glue of Phragmatopoma californica for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Brent D Winslow; Hui Shao; Russell J Stewart; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Real time monitoring of biomaterial-mediated inflammatory responses via macrophage-targeting NIR nanoprobes.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Yi-Ting Tsai; Hong Weng; David W Baker; Liping Tang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Subfractions of enamel matrix derivative differentially influence cytokine secretion from human oral fibroblasts.

Authors:  Oscar Villa; Steven J Brookes; Bernd Thiede; Lars Heijl; Staale P Lyngstadaas; Janne E Reseland
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 7.813

4.  Surface Modification of Direct-Current and Radio-Frequency Oxygen Plasma Treatments Enhance Cell Biocompatibility.

Authors:  Wan-Ching Chou; Rex C-C Wang; Cheng Liu; Chyun-Yu Yang; Tzer-Min Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.