Literature DB >> 1534777

Risk assessment in immunotoxicology. I. Sensitivity and predictability of immune tests.

M I Luster1, C Portier, D G Pait, K L White, C Gennings, A E Munson, G J Rosenthal.   

Abstract

We have previously reported on the design and content of a screening battery involving a "tier" approach for detecting potential immunotoxic compounds in mice (Luster et al., 1988, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 10, 2-19). This battery has now been utilized to examine a variety of compounds by the NIEHS Immunotoxicology Laboratory, the National Toxicology Program-sponsored laboratories, and by the Cell Biology Department at the Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology. The database generated from these studies, which consists of over 50 selected compounds, has been collected and analyzed in an attempt to improve future testing strategies and provide information to aid in quantitative risk assessment for immunotoxicity. Studies presented here have established the ability of each of the tests or test combinations in the screening battery to detect immunotoxic compounds. Efforts are currently underway using this database to determine the relationships between these immune tests and susceptibility to challenge with infectious agents or transplantable tumor cells. The present analyses indicated that the performance of only two or three immune tests are sufficient to predict immunotoxic compounds in rodents (greater than 90% concordance). The tests that showed the highest association with immunotoxicity were the splenic antibody plaque forming cell response (78%) and cell surface marker analysis (83%). The relationship between immunotoxicity and carcinogenicity, as well as genotoxicity, was also determined. These analyses suggested that potential immunotoxic compounds are likely to be rodent carcinogens (p = 0.019) although for compounds that are not immunotoxic the carcinogenic status is unclear. There was no relationship observed between immunotoxicity and mutagenicity as determined using in vitro genotoxicity tests. The significance of these observations is discussed in terms of the relationship between immunotoxicity tests and biological/toxicological processes concerned with human health (e.g., infectious disease).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1534777     DOI: 10.1016/0272-0590(92)90047-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0272-0590


  55 in total

1.  Machine learning analysis of the relationship between changes in immunological parameters and changes in resistance to Listeria monocytogenes: a new approach for risk assessment and systems immunology.

Authors:  Zhifa Liu; Changhe Yuan; Stephen B Pruett
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Effects of Fuzheng Paidu tablet on peripheral blood T lymphocytes, intestinal mucosa T lymphocytes, and immune organs in cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppressed mice.

Authors:  Mingsan Miao; Bolin Cheng; Lin Guo; Jingjing Shi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Enhanced histopathology of the spleen.

Authors:  Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 4.  Chemical compounds from anthropogenic environment and immune evasion mechanisms: potential interactions.

Authors:  Julia Kravchenko; Emanuela Corsini; Marc A Williams; William Decker; Masoud H Manjili; Takemi Otsuki; Neetu Singh; Faha Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Anna Maria Colacci; Monica Vaccari; Chiara Mondello; A Ivana Scovassi; Jayadev Raju; Roslida A Hamid; Lorenzo Memeo; Stefano Forte; Rabindra Roy; Jordan Woodrick; Hosni K Salem; Elizabeth P Ryan; Dustin G Brown; William H Bisson; Leroy Lowe; H Kim Lyerly
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Effects of environmentally-relevant levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate on clinical parameters and immunological functions in B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  Patricia A Fair; Erin Driscoll; Meagan A M Mollenhauer; Sarah G Bradshaw; Se Hun Yun; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Gregory D Bossart; Deborah E Keil; Margie M Peden-Adams
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Children's white blood cell counts in relation to developmental exposures to methylmercury and persistent organic pollutants.

Authors:  Y Oulhote; Z Shamim; K Kielsen; P Weihe; P Grandjean; L P Ryder; C Heilmann
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 7.  Perfluorinated compounds: emerging POPs with potential immunotoxicity.

Authors:  Emanuela Corsini; Robert W Luebke; Dori R Germolec; Jamie C DeWitt
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 8.  Immunotoxicity of organophosphorous pesticides.

Authors:  Tamara Galloway; Richard Handy
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2003 Feb-Aug       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Establishment of an immunoglobulin m antibody-forming cell response model for characterizing immunotoxicity in primary human B cells.

Authors:  Haitian Lu; Robert B Crawford; Colin M North; Barbara L F Kaplan; Norbert E Kaminski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Immunomodulatory effects of domoic acid differ between in vivo and in vitro exposure in mice.

Authors:  Milton Levin; Heather Leibrecht; James Ryan; Frances Van Dolah; Sylvain De Guise
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.