AIM: To evaluate the ability of two luting procedures for bonding translucent fibre posts to form resin tags, adhesive lateral branches, and resin dentine interdiffusion zones (RDIZ). METHODOLOGY: Forty root filled teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected for the study. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 10 each. Group 1: One Step, light-cured (LC) 20 s + dual link resin cement (LC 20 s); group 2: One Step, not light-cured (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 30 s); group 3: One Step (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 60 s); group 4: One Step (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 90 sec). Forty translucent fibre posts (DT posts, RTD) were inserted. Then, root specimens were processed for scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations to assess the continuity of the RDIZ, the presence or absence of gaps and the density and morphology of resin tags using a four-step scale method. RESULTS: With all luting procedures the formation of a RDIZ occurred. However, the microscopic examination of adhesive interfaces revealed that the percentage of RDIZ was significantly higher in group 1 than in the other three groups (P < 0.05). Group 4 had a higher percentage of RDIZ than group 3, which in turn exhibited a greater percentage than group 2, but these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Resin tag formation was evident in all the groups. The characteristic reverse cone shape of resin tags was always noted in the coronal and middle third of all groups, and in the apical third of group 1. In the apical third a shorter length and a less uniform appearance of resin tags were noted in groups 2, 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: In this laboratory study, when bonding a translucent fibre post into a root canal, the luting procedure including light curing of the adhesive solution before the placement of the cement was more satisfactory, from a SEM standpoint, than the procedure involving the simultaneous curing of adhesive and cement (one step procedure).
AIM: To evaluate the ability of two luting procedures for bonding translucent fibre posts to form resin tags, adhesive lateral branches, and resin dentine interdiffusion zones (RDIZ). METHODOLOGY: Forty root filled teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected for the study. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 10 each. Group 1: One Step, light-cured (LC) 20 s + dual link resin cement (LC 20 s); group 2: One Step, not light-cured (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 30 s); group 3: One Step (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 60 s); group 4: One Step (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 90 sec). Forty translucent fibre posts (DT posts, RTD) were inserted. Then, root specimens were processed for scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations to assess the continuity of the RDIZ, the presence or absence of gaps and the density and morphology of resin tags using a four-step scale method. RESULTS: With all luting procedures the formation of a RDIZ occurred. However, the microscopic examination of adhesive interfaces revealed that the percentage of RDIZ was significantly higher in group 1 than in the other three groups (P < 0.05). Group 4 had a higher percentage of RDIZ than group 3, which in turn exhibited a greater percentage than group 2, but these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Resin tag formation was evident in all the groups. The characteristic reverse cone shape of resin tags was always noted in the coronal and middle third of all groups, and in the apical third of group 1. In the apical third a shorter length and a less uniform appearance of resin tags were noted in groups 2, 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: In this laboratory study, when bonding a translucent fibre post into a root canal, the luting procedure including light curing of the adhesive solution before the placement of the cement was more satisfactory, from a SEM standpoint, than the procedure involving the simultaneous curing of adhesive and cement (one step procedure).