Literature DB >> 15347000

The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.

Praveen V Mummaneni1, Regis W Haid.   

Abstract

In the past 50 years tremendous advances have been made in the treatment of cervical disc disease with cervical fusion. Fusion rates have surpassed 95% after application of anterior cervical implants. Adjacent-segment degeneration, however, has plagued the long-term clinical success of cervical fusion. Cervical arthroplasty has been introduced to maintain cervical motion and potentially avoid or minimize adjacent-segment degeneration. If cervical arthroplasty is successful, the long-term results of surgery for cervical disc disease may improve; however, there are associated drawbacks that must be overcome. Implant wear, fatigue, and failure have been reported in cases of large-joint arthroplasty, and research is underway to limit these problems in cervical arthroplasty. In this article the authors trace the evolution of cervical fusion and the new technique of cervical arthroplasty. The nomenclature of cervical arthroplasty will also be introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15347000     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  10 in total

Review 1.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhuo Ma; Xun Ma; Huilin Yang; Xiaoming Guan; Xiang Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Is cervical disc arthroplasty superior to fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Yin; Xiao Yu; Shuangli Zhou; Zhanhai Yin; Yusheng Qiu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Multi-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus single-level CDA for the treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hua Zhao; Lei Cheng; Yong Hou; Yi Liu; Ben Liu; Jyoti Joshi Mundra; Lin Nie
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Sheng Huang; Min Gong; Xuejun Dai; Manman Gao; Ting Yu; Zhiyu Zhou; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-18

5.  ISASS Policy Statement - Cervical Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Cost-utility analysis modeling at 2-year follow-up for cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A single-center contribution to the randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel Warren; Tate Andres; Christian Hoelscher; Pedro Ricart-Hoffiz; John Bendo; Jeffrey Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2013-12-01

7.  Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Michael S Hisey; Hyun W Bae; Reginald Davis; Steven Gaede; Greg Hoffman; Kee Kim; Pierce D Nunley; Daniel Peterson; Ralph Rashbaum; John Stokes
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Biomechanical Comparison of a New Memory Compression Alloy Plate versus Traditional Titanium Plate for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jiantao Liu; Runqing Wang; Hongbo Wang; Yanbiao Wang; Dongbo Lv; Pan Diao; Shihan Feng; Yanzheng Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Clinical effects of the bridge-type ROI-C interbody fusion cage system in the treatment of cervical spondylosis with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yuluo Rong; Yongjun Luo; Wei Liu; Fangyi Gong; Pengyu Tang; Weihua Cai
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Discrepancy between cervical disc prostheses and anatomical cervical dimensions.

Authors:  Sinan Karaca; Ahmet Onur Akpolat; Ahmet Oztermeli; Mehmet Nuri Erdem; Mehmet Aydogan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.511

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.