Literature DB >> 15346816

A 2 hour versus the 3 hour 100 g glucose tolerance test for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus.

Peter Jakobi1, Ido Solt, Amir Weissman.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine how the omission of the third hour glucose measurement of the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (GTT) affects the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 876 women delivered in a tertiary care hospital in Israel during a three-year period, who underwent a 100 g 3 hour oral GTT following an abnormal 50 g glucose screen. GDM was diagnosed according to the "criterion standard" accepted in the Fourth International Workshop Conference on GDM. The results of the 100 g 3 hour oral GTT were then retrospectively re-evaluated by omission of the third hour plasma glucose measurement from the "criterion standard".
RESULTS: GDM was diagnosed in 28.4% of the study. patients, while the omission of the third hour glucose measurement resulted in a 26.4% diagnosis of GDM. The perinatal data of the 18-omitted cases suggests that their exclusion from the GDM group would not have altered substantially the perinatal outcome of the study cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: A 100 g 2 hour oral GTT is a simple and economic alternative to the 100 g 3 hour oral GTT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15346816     DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2004.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  2 in total

1.  Difference between 2 h and 3 h 75 g glucose tolerance test in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): results from a national survey on prevalence of GDM.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Gao; Yu-Mei Wei; Hui-Xia Yang; Xian-Ming Xu; Ling Fan; Jing He; Ning Liu; San-Cun Zhao; Ya-Li Hu; Zi Yang; Yun-Ping Zhang; Xing-Hui Liu; Xu Chen; Jian-Ping Zhang; Wen-Li Gou; Mei Xiao; Hai-Rong Wu; Mei-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2010-08-10

2.  Diagnosis of gestational diabetes: Are five rounds of blood sampling necessary?

Authors:  Hyun-Hwa Cha; Won Ki Lee; Sujeong Kim; Hyun Mi Kim; Mi Ju Kim; Won Joon Seong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.