Literature DB >> 15346745

Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine-derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: a clinical and histologic study in humans.

Gregory S Vance1, Henry Greenwell, Richard L Miller, Margaret Hill, Hudson Johnston, James P Scheetz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this randomized, controlled, blinded clinical study was to compare ridge dimensions and histologic characteristics of ridges preserved with 2 different graft materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four subjects, each requiring a nonmolar extraction and delayed implant placement, were randomly selected to receive ridge preservation treatment with either an allograft in an experimental putty carrier plus a calcium sulfate barrier (PUT) or a bovine-derived xenograft (BDX) plus a collagen membrane. Horizontal and vertical ridge dimensions were determined using a digital caliper and a template. At 4 months postextraction, a trephine core was obtained for histologic analysis.
RESULTS: The average ridge width decreased by 0.50 mm for both groups (P < .05). The midbuccal vertical change for the PUT group was a loss of 0.3+/-0.7 mm versus a gain of 0.7+/-1.2 mm for the BDX group, a difference of 1.0 mm (P > .05). Histologic analysis revealed vital bone in the PUT group of about 61%+/-9% versus 26%+/-20% for the BDX group (P < .05). DISCUSSION: Greater vital bone fill in the PUT group may be attributable to earlier and greater vascular invasion of the carrier material. The putty material was characterized by ease of handling, simple placement, and enhanced graft particle containment.
CONCLUSIONS: Allograft mixed with an experimental putty carrier produced significantly more vital bone fill than did the use of a xenograft with no carrier material. Ridge width and height dimensions were similarly preserved with both graft materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15346745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  19 in total

1.  A simplified approach to the minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique utilizing a viscoelastic medium for hydraulic sinus floor elevation.

Authors:  Georgios A Kotsakis; Ziv Mazor
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-11-18

Review 2.  Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Javairia Qureshi; Abdullah M Alshahrani; Heba Nassar; Yuichi Ikeda; Michael Glogauer; Bernhard Ganss
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 3.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel H M Alsabeeha; Alan G T Payne; Warwick Duncan; Clovis M Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-28

Review 4.  A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Francesco Orlando; Marco Ottobelli; Davide Fiori; Umberto Garagiola
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 5.  Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Canullo; M Del Fabbro; S Khijmatgar; S Panda; A Ravidà; G Tommasato; A Sculean; P Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Simon Young; Leda Klouda; Mark Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Comparison of alveolar ridge preservation methods using three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic analysis and two-dimensional histometric evaluation.

Authors:  Young-Seok Park; Sungtae Kim; Seung-Hee Oh; Hee-Jung Park; Sophia Lee; Tae-Il Kim; Young-Kyu Lee; Min-Suk Heo
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-06-11

8.  To assess the efficacy of socket plug technique using platelet rich fibrin with or without the use of bone substitute in alveolar ridge preservation: a prospective randomised controlled study.

Authors:  N Girish Kumar; Rupanzal Chaudhary; Ish Kumar; Srimathy S Arora; Nilesh Kumar; Hem Singh
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-02-06

9.  Socket preservation using deproteinized horse-derived bone mineral.

Authors:  Jang-Yeol Park; Ki-Tae Koo; Tae-Il Kim; Yang-Jo Seol; Yong-Moo Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu; Chong-Pyoung Chung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 2.614

10.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Alan Gt Payne; Sara Ali; Clovis M Jr Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.