Literature DB >> 15346175

Review of ozone and temperature lidar validations performed within the framework of the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change.

Philippe Keckhut1, Stuart McDermid, Daan Swart, Thomas McGee, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, Alberto Adriani, John Barnes, Jean-Luc Baray, Hassan Bencherif, Hans Claude, Aleide G di Sarra, Georgio Fiocco, Georg Hansen, Alain Hauchecorne, Thierry Leblanc, Choo Hie Lee, Shiv Pal, Gerard Megie, Hideaki Nakane, Roland Neuber, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, Jeffrey Thayer.   

Abstract

The use of assimilation tools for satellite validation requires true estimates of the accuracy of the reference data. Since its inception, the Network for Detection of Stratospheric Change (NDSC) has provided systematic lidar measurements of ozone and temperature at several places around the world that are well adapted for satellite validations. Regular exercises have been organised to ensure the data quality at each individual site. These exercises can be separated into three categories: large scale intercomparisons using multiple instruments, including a mobile lidar; using satellite observations as a geographic transfer standards to compare measurements at different sites; and comparative investigations of the analysis software. NDSC is a research network, so each system has its own history, design, and analysis, and has participated differently in validation campaigns. There are still some technological differences that may explain different accuracies. However, the comparison campaigns performed over the last decade have always proved to be very helpful in improving the measurements. To date, more efforts have been devoted to characterising ozone measurements than to temperature observations. The synthesis of the published works shows that the network can potentially be considered as homogeneous within +/-2% between 20-35 km for ozone and +/-1 K between 35-60 km for temperature. Outside this altitude range, larger biases are reported and more efforts are required. In the lower stratosphere, Raman channels seem to improve comparisons but such capabilities were not systematically compared. At the top of the profiles, more investigations on analysis methodologies are still probably needed. SAGE II and GOMOS appear to be excellent tools for future ozone lidar validations but need to be better coordinated and take more advantage of assimilation tools. Also, temperature validations face major difficulties caused by atmospheric tides and therefore require intercomparisons with the mobile systems, at all sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15346175     DOI: 10.1039/b404256e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  3 in total

1.  The mystery of recent stratospheric temperature trends.

Authors:  David W J Thompson; Dian J Seidel; William J Randel; Cheng-Zhi Zou; Amy H Butler; Carl Mears; Albert Osso; Craig Long; Roger Lin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Ground-based assessment of the bias and long-term stability of fourteen limb and occultation ozone profile data records.

Authors:  D Hubert; J-C Lambert; T Verhoelst; J Granville; A Keppens; J-L Baray; U Cortesi; D A Degenstein; L Froidevaux; S Godin-Beekmann; K W Hoppel; E Kyrölä; T Leblanc; G Lichtenberg; C T McElroy; D Murtagh; H Nakane; R Querel; J M Russell; J Salvador; H G J Smit; K Stebel; W Steinbrecht; K B Strawbridge; R Stübi; D P J Swart; G Taha; A M Thompson; J Urban; J A E van Gijsel; P von der Gathen; K A Walker; E Wolfram; J M Zawodny
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Tidal effects on stratospheric temperature series derived from successive advanced microwave sounding units.

Authors:  P Keckhut; B M Funatsu; C Claud; A Hauchecorne
Journal:  Q J R Meteorol Soc       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.739

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.