Literature DB >> 15345967

Dynamic effects of a 9 mm missile on cadaveric skull protected by aramid, polyethylene or aluminum plate: an experimental study.

Jean-Claude Sarron1, Marwan Dannawi, Alexis Faure, Jean-Paul Caillou, Joseph Da Cunha, Roger Robert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most military helmets are designed to prevent penetration by small firearms using composite materials in their construction. However, the transient deformation of the composite helmet during a non penetrating impact may result in severe head injury.
METHOD: Two experimental designs were undertaken to characterize the extend of injuries imparted by composite panels using in protective helmets. In the first series, 21 dry skulls were protected by polyethylene plates, with gaps between the protective plate and skull ranging from 12 to 15 mm. In another design, using 9 cadavers, heads were protected by aluminum, aramid, or polyethylene plates. Specimens were instrumented with pressure gauges to record the impact response. The ammunition used in these experiments was 9 mm caliber and had a velocity of 400 m/s. A macroscopic analysis of the specimens quantified fractures and injuries, which were then related to the measured pressures.
RESULTS: Protective plates influenced both the levels of injury and the intracranial pressure. Injuries were accentuated as the plates was changed from aluminum to composite materials and ranged from skin laceration to extensive skull fractures and brain contusion. Fractures were associated with brain parenchymal pressures in excess of 560 kPa and cerebrospinal fluid pressure of 150 kPa. An air gap of a few millimeters between the plate and the head was sufficient to decrease these internal pressures by half, significantly reducing the level of injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Ballistic helmets made of composite materials could be optimized to avoid extensive transient deformation and thus reduce the impact and blunt trauma to the head. However, this deformation cannot be completely removed, which is why the gap between the helmet and the head must be maintained at more than 12 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15345967     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000133575.48065.3f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  7 in total

1.  Effect of helmet liner systems and impact directions on severity of head injuries sustained in ballistic impacts: a finite element (FE) study.

Authors:  Kwong Ming Tse; Long Bin Tan; Bin Yang; Vincent Beng Chye Tan; Heow Pueh Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Traumatic brain injury and aeromedical evacuation: when is the brain fit to fly?

Authors:  Michael D Goodman; Amy T Makley; Alex B Lentsch; Stephen L Barnes; Gina R Dorlac; Warren C Dorlac; Jay A Johannigman; Timothy A Pritts
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Intracranial pressure response to non-penetrating ballistic impact: an experimental study using a pig physical head model and live pigs.

Authors:  Hai Liu; Jianyi Kang; Jing Chen; Guanhua Li; Xiaoxia Li; Jianmin Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Dynamic response due to behind helmet blunt trauma measured with a human head surrogate.

Authors:  Christopher J Freitas; James T Mathis; Nikki Scott; Rory P Bigger; James Mackiewicz
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Development of a Human Cranial Bone Surrogate for Impact Studies.

Authors:  Jack C Roberts; Andrew C Merkle; Catherine M Carneal; Liming M Voo; Matthew S Johannes; Jeff M Paulson; Sara Tankard; O Manny Uy
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10-24

6.  Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?

Authors:  P F Mahoney; D J Carr; R J Delaney; N Hunt; S Harrison; J Breeze; I Gibb
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Forensic reconstruction of two military combat related shooting incidents using an anatomically correct synthetic skull with a surrogate skin/soft tissue layer.

Authors:  Peter Mahoney; Debra Carr; Karl Harrison; Ruth McGuire; Alan Hepper; Daniel Flynn; Russ J Delaney; Iain Gibb
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.686

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.