OBJECTIVE: To find out why pregnant women who receive HIV-1 positive test results and are offered short course antiretroviral prophylaxis to prevent transmission of HIV from mother to child do not participate in necessary follow up visits before starting prophylaxis. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: A programme aiming to prevent transmission of HIV from mother to child at a public antenatal clinic in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 27 women who had received HIV-1 positive test results and were invited to return for monthly follow up visits before starting prophylaxis with zidovudine at 36 weeks' gestation, but who had either refused or discontinued the visits. None of the women started prophylaxis. RESULTS: Most of the women explained their non-participation in follow up visits by referring to negative experiences that they had had while interacting with programme staff or to their views about the programme. Additional reasons concerned their disbelief of HIV positive test results and personal factors. CONCLUSIONS: Difficulties experienced by women during their contacts with staff working on the prevention programme and negative views that they have about the programme can contribute to their non-participation in prophylaxis. Training and supervision of programme staff may increase the likelihood of positive interactions between staff and clients, thereby facilitating women's participation in preventing transmission of HIV from mother to child. Outreach and mobilisation in communities that are served by prevention programmes may complement these measures at programme level by contributing to increased social support for women's efforts to prevent transmission of HIV from mother to child.
OBJECTIVE: To find out why pregnant women who receive HIV-1 positive test results and are offered short course antiretroviral prophylaxis to prevent transmission of HIV from mother to child do not participate in necessary follow up visits before starting prophylaxis. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: A programme aiming to prevent transmission of HIV from mother to child at a public antenatal clinic in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 27 women who had received HIV-1 positive test results and were invited to return for monthly follow up visits before starting prophylaxis with zidovudine at 36 weeks' gestation, but who had either refused or discontinued the visits. None of the women started prophylaxis. RESULTS: Most of the women explained their non-participation in follow up visits by referring to negative experiences that they had had while interacting with programme staff or to their views about the programme. Additional reasons concerned their disbelief of HIV positive test results and personal factors. CONCLUSIONS: Difficulties experienced by women during their contacts with staff working on the prevention programme and negative views that they have about the programme can contribute to their non-participation in prophylaxis. Training and supervision of programme staff may increase the likelihood of positive interactions between staff and clients, thereby facilitating women's participation in preventing transmission of HIV from mother to child. Outreach and mobilisation in communities that are served by prevention programmes may complement these measures at programme level by contributing to increased social support for women's efforts to prevent transmission of HIV from mother to child.
Authors: L A Guay; P Musoke; T Fleming; D Bagenda; M Allen; C Nakabiito; J Sherman; P Bakaki; C Ducar; M Deseyve; L Emel; M Mirochnick; M G Fowler; L Mofenson; P Miotti; K Dransfield; D Bray; F Mmiro; J B Jackson Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-09-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Y Nebié; N Meda; V Leroy; L Mandelbrot; S Yaro; I Sombié; M Cartoux; S Tiendrébeogo; B Dao; A Ouangré; B Nacro; P Fao; O Ky-Zerbo; P Van de Perre; F Dabis Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2001-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Elizabeth M Stringer; Moses Sinkala; Jeffrey S Stringer; Elizabeth Mzyece; Ida Makuka; Robert L Goldenberg; Pascal Kwape; Martha Chilufya; Sten H Vermund Journal: AIDS Date: 2003-06-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jeffrey H Herbst; Marlene Glassman; James W Carey; Thomas M Painter; Deborah J Gelaude; Amy M Fasula; Jerris L Raiford; Arin E Freeman; Camilla Harshbarger; Abigail H Viall; David W Purcell Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Elizabeth M Stringer; Benjamin H Chi; Namwinga Chintu; Tracy L Creek; Didier K Ekouevi; David Coetzee; Pius Tih; Andrew Boulle; Francois Dabis; Nathan Shaffer; Catherine M Wilfert; Jeffrey S A Stringer Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Lydia Feinstein; Andrew Edmonds; Vitus Okitolonda; Stephen R Cole; Annelies Van Rie; Benjamin H Chi; Papy Ndjibu; Jean Lusiama; Jean L Chalachala; Frieda Behets Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Abigail M Hatcher; Patrizia Romito; Merab Odero; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Maricianah Onono; Janet M Turan Journal: Cult Health Sex Date: 2013-02-06
Authors: Winfreda Chandisarewa; Lynda Stranix-Chibanda; Elizabeth Chirapa; Anna Miller; Micah Simoyi; Agnes Mahomva; Yvonne Maldonado; Avinash K Shetty Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 9.408